Thanks a lot Mark and Cory and Peter.
we moved to single FS with nodemap...
/Zee
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
> Oops, right! Mark, thanks for pointing that out. Peter, thanks for the
> update on ZFS 0.8.
> -Cory
>
> --
>
> On 6/28/18, 5:20 PM, "Peter Jones" wrote:
>
>
On Jun 28, 2018, at 21:14, yu sun wrote:
>
> all server and client that fore-mentioned is using netmasks 255.255.255.224.
> and they can ping with each other, for example:
>
> root@ml-gpu-ser200.nmg01:~$ ping node28
> PING node28 (10.82.143.202) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from node28 (10
On Jun 28, 2018, at 22:44, vaibhav pol wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using the precompiled rpms from site
> (https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.11.0/el7.4.1708/).
> Modprobe is not able to find the lnet module . Tried to insert using insmod.
> Following is the error message.
>
Hi,
I am using the precompiled rpms from site
(https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.11.0/el7.4.1708/).
Modprobe is not able to find the lnet module . Tried to insert using insmod.
Following is the error message.
cfs_array_alloc (err 0)
cfs_get_random_bytes (err 0)
cfs_expr_
It would be useful to include the actual error messages, in particular which
module symbols it is complaining about.
Cheers, Andreas
On Jun 28, 2018, at 22:01, vaibhav pol wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I have installed the Lustre client RPMS (Version 2.11.0) on CentOS 7.4
>
> Whenever I tried
Hi,
I have installed the Lustre client RPMS (Version 2.11.0) on CentOS 7.4
Whenever I tried to insert lnet module it give the unknown symbol message and
not able to load modules. Tried to insert forcefully but that is also not
working.
Thanks and regards,
Vaibhav
all server and client that fore-mentioned is using netmasks
255.255.255.224. and they can ping with each other, for example:
root@ml-gpu-ser200.nmg01:~$ ping node28
PING node28 (10.82.143.202) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from node28 (10.82.143.202): icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=0.047 ms
64 bytes fro
Oops, right! Mark, thanks for pointing that out. Peter, thanks for the update
on ZFS 0.8.
-Cory
--
On 6/28/18, 5:20 PM, "Peter Jones" wrote:
Correct. ZFS 0.8 will provide the necessary changes in the underlying ZFS.
On 2018-06-28, 3:10 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Mark Hah
On Jun 27, 2018, at 06:05, Mark Roper wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy & All,
> I got a request to share the results of my SSK performance investigation with
> this group from Mark Hahn, which I'm happy to do! If you're not interested
> in the impact on throughput for encryption of client-to-mds and clien
Correct. ZFS 0.8 will provide the necessary changes in the underlying ZFS.
On 2018-06-28, 3:10 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Mark Hahn"
wrote:
> FYI, Project Quotas exist beginning with Lustre 2.10.0.
but not yet for ZFS configs, right? sorry, I don't remember whether
the
FYI, Project Quotas exist beginning with Lustre 2.10.0.
but not yet for ZFS configs, right? sorry, I don't remember whether
the OP mentioned which underfilesystem they were using...
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
htt
> Lustre's current/traditional owner-based quota accounting
> is a bit of a drag, but eventually there will be project quotas...
FYI, Project Quotas exist beginning with Lustre 2.10.0.
Info is in the Lustre Ops Manual at
http://doc.lustre.org/lustre_manual.xhtml#idm140687075905776.
-Cory
--
> On Jun 27, 2018, at 4:44 PM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 27, 2018, at 3:12 AM, yu sun wrote:
>>
>> client:
>> root@ml-gpu-ser200.nmg01:~$ mount -t lustre
>> node28@o2ib1:node29@o2ib1:/project /mnt/lustre_data
>> mount.lustre: mount node28@o2ib1:node29@o2ib1:/
For #3 you should look at "nodemap" and "subdirectory mount" in the
manual. I agree that simple user permissions should be the starting
point, but if you need more complete isolation (eg. if users are in charge of
VM images), then the following presentation will be useful:
http://wiki.lustre.org/i
we have different research groups i am thinking to have one filesystem and
beneath it using ACL have project folders .
well, the first approach should be to use the normal Unix mechanism:
owners and groups. ACLs are usually treated as a way to make exceptions,
since owner/group will capture m
All,
Be advised that you if you had a previous working account with Intel HPDD,
there is no need to sign up for a new one. You can use the exact same
credentials you used with http://jira.hpdd.intel.com.
-Cory
--
From: lustre-discuss on behalf of
"Moreno Diego (ID SIS)"
Date: Thursday,
It seems expensive (straight mirroring rather than parity’s) and it’s
asynchronous from Lustre, so if you’re really just syncing the block devices,
that can’t guarantee safety on failure. If I understand what you’re doing,
when a failure occurs, drbd may be in the middle of syncing the block d
Diego
Free sign up got restricted some months ago after a series of spam attacks on
the wiki (which shares login credentials with JIRA). I’ll see about getting the
message updated – in the meantime I will reach out to you privately to get this
sorted out.
Peter
From: lustre-discuss on behalf
we have different research groups i am thinking to have one filesystem and
beneath it using ACL have project folders .
Just curious what re the pros/cons of having multiple filesystem vs single
filesystem with folders ?
any advice ?
/Zeeshan
___
lustre
Found the answers:
http://doc.lustre.org/lustre_manual.xhtml#dbdoclet.50438194_88063
http://doc.lustre.org/lustre_manual.xhtml#managingsecurity
Thanks for manual :)
/Zee
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:48 AM Zeeshan Ali Shah
wrote:
> Dear All,
> During mdt it ask for --fsname flag , docs mentioned
20 matches
Mail list logo
