On 03/05/2019 22.41, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On May 3, 2019, at 14:33, Patrick Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> As a general rule, Lustre only supports mixing versions on servers for
>> rolling upgrades.
>>
>> - Patrick
>
> And only then between maintenance versions of the same release (e.g.
On May 3, 2019, at 14:33, Patrick Farrell wrote:
>
> Thomas,
>
> As a general rule, Lustre only supports mixing versions on servers for
> rolling upgrades.
>
> - Patrick
And only then between maintenance versions of the same release (e.g. 2.10.6
and 2.10.7). If you are upgrading, say,
Thomas,
As a general rule, Lustre only supports mixing versions on servers for rolling
upgrades.
- Patrick
From: lustre-discuss on behalf of
Thomas Roth
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 3:54:09 AM
To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject:
That would mean the union of `lfs find --pool HDD /mnt/lustre` and `lfs
find ! --pool HDD /mnt/lustre` would NOT be ALL files. I agree a
semantic for finding files that are have no elements in a pool would be
useful, I think using a not operator where it's not the inverse would be
surprising.
