Amit,
I don't think that lustre will do exactly what you want in this case. If you
mount the entire file system, then you could restrict access to a directory
based on normal uid/gid permission or even ACLs. But those restrictions would
then apply to every lustre client that mounted the file
Hi Megan, I have no experience with DDN, but totally agree with Cory on
interoperability.
in our environment we have mixed lustre 2.9, 2.10, 2.12, depend on HW age.
we had some problems with 2.9 - 2.12.x with multihomed clients, but by
tweaking lnet configs everything is working w/o problems.
We
Hi David,
Thank you for your reply. Yes I would like to use the isolation mentioned in
the link you shared, but a bit differently. I did a bit of reading but it
appears to me, that Isolation provided by filesets feature allows me to mount
sub-directory in isolation of the root directory, and us
Hello, Megan.
I was curious why you made this comment:
> A general example is a box with lustre-client 2.10.4 is not going to be
> completely happy with a new 2.12.x on the lustre network
In general, I think that the two LTS release are very interoperable. What
incompatibility are you referring
Hello!
I have no direct experience with the DDN AI400X, but as a vendor DDN has
some nice value-add to the Lustre systems they build. Having worked with
other DDN Lustre hw in my career, interoperability with other Lustre mounts
is usually not an issue unless the current lustre-client software on
Hi everyone,
Haven't been on this list for a while :)
At my new job we are considering getting a DDN AI400X system which as far
as I understood from them is Lustre for some machine learning nodes.
I'm just wondering how nice these play with other lustre systems, am I
getting myself a vendor lock-in
