On Oct 1, 2023, at 00:36, Tung-Han Hsieh via lustre-discuss
wrote:
> I should apologize for replying late. Here I would like to clarify why in my
> opinion the Lustre ldiskfs code is not self-contained.
>
> In the past, to compile lustre with ldiskfs, we needed to patch Linux kernel
> using
On Oct 1, 2023, at 05:54, Arman Khalatyan via lustre-discuss
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are in the process of integrating the Lustre client into Debian. Are there
> any legal concerns or significant obstacles to this? We're curious why it
> hasn't been included in the official Debian
On Oct 1, 2023, at 05:54, Arman Khalatyan via lustre-discuss
mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>> wrote:
Hello everyone,
We are in the process of integrating the Lustre client into Debian. Are there
any legal concerns or significant obstacles to this? We're curious why it
hasn't been
Hello everyone,
We are in the process of integrating the Lustre client into Debian. Are
there any legal concerns or significant obstacles to this? We're curious
why it hasn't been included in the official Debian repository so far. There
used to be an old, unmaintained Lustre client branch dating
Dear All,
I should apologize for replying late. Here I would like to clarify why in
my opinion the Lustre ldiskfs code is not self-contained.
In the past, to compile lustre with ldiskfs, we needed to patch Linux
kernel using the patches provided by Lustre source code. And YES, for the
recent
