[lustre-discuss] lustre-client-dkms-2.15.4 is still checking for python2

2024-01-19 Thread BALVERS Martin via lustre-discuss
Hi, FYI It seems that lustre-client-dkms-2.15.4 is still checking for python2 and does not install on AlmaLinux 9.3 # dnf --enablerepo=lustre-client install lustre-client lustre-client-dkms Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:50 ago on Fri Jan 19 11:43:54 2024. Error: Problem: conflicting

Re: [lustre-discuss] Data stored in OST

2023-05-23 Thread BALVERS Martin via lustre-discuss
I have a question about the following comment: >>> The usual practice is to use RAUD10 for the MDT(s) on "enterprise" >>> high-endurance SSD, and RAID6 for the OST on "professional" mixed-load SSDs >>> or "small" (1-2TB at most) "datacenter" HDDs, fronted by failover-servers. What would be the

Re: [lustre-discuss] Mistake while removing an OST

2023-02-02 Thread BALVERS Martin via lustre-discuss
- this is an external email ** You should just be able to run the "writeconf" process to regenerate the config logs. The removed OST will not re-register with the MGS, but all of the other servers will, so it should be fine. Cheers, Andreas On Feb 1, 2023, at 03:48, BALVERS Martin via lust

[lustre-discuss] Mistake while removing an OST

2023-02-01 Thread BALVERS Martin via lustre-discuss
Hi, I have a defective OSS with a single OST that I was tying to remove from the lustre filesystem completely (2.15.1). I was following https://doc.lustre.org/lustre_manual.xhtml#lustremaint.remove_ost I had drained the OST and was now using the commands with llog_cancel to remove the config.