Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large Corosync/Pacemaker clusters

2012-11-06 Thread Hall, Shawn
Passerini [mailto:marco.passer...@csc.fi] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 7:13 AM To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org Cc: Hall, Shawn Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large Corosync/Pacemaker clusters Hi, I'm also setting up a high-available Lustre system, I configured pairs for the OSSes and M

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large Corosync/Pacemaker clusters

2012-10-31 Thread Hall, Shawn
room to move around. Without this certain nodes would have low memory issues related to networking and would get stonithed due to unresponsiveness. Thanks, Shawn -Original Message- From: Charles Taylor [mailto:tay...@hpc.ufl.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:33 PM To: Hall, Shawn

[Lustre-discuss] Large Corosync/Pacemaker clusters

2012-10-24 Thread Hall, Shawn
Hi, We're setting up fairly large Lustre 2.1.2 filesystems, each with 18 nodes and 159 resources all in one Corosync/Pacemaker cluster as suggested by our vendor. We're getting mixed messages on how large of a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster will work well between our vendor an others. 1.