Passerini [mailto:marco.passer...@csc.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 7:13 AM
To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Cc: Hall, Shawn
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large Corosync/Pacemaker clusters
Hi,
I'm also setting up a high-available Lustre system, I configured pairs
for the OSSes and M
room to
move around. Without this certain nodes would have low memory issues
related to networking and would get stonithed due to unresponsiveness.
Thanks,
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Charles Taylor [mailto:tay...@hpc.ufl.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:33 PM
To: Hall, Shawn
Hi,
We're setting up fairly large Lustre 2.1.2 filesystems, each with 18
nodes and 159 resources all in one Corosync/Pacemaker cluster as
suggested by our vendor. We're getting mixed messages on how large of a
Corosync/Pacemaker cluster will work well between our vendor an others.
1.