Hello,
I am totally new to lustre. I have inherited a couple of clusters which have a
lustre filesystem mounted on each node via infiniband.
one cluster has 56 nodes on it, the other has about 18.
There are 6 lustre servers, five of which are ost's and the sixth is the ost.
I have a problem
question: will
the lustre kernel modules load in kernel 3.x?
--jason
Jason Brooks
971-238-3924
brook...@ohsu.edu<mailto:brook...@ohsu.edu>
Oregon Health Sciences University
Center for Spoken Language Understanding
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
? There's already > 16 terabytes in place...
--jason
Jason Brooks
971-238-3924
brook...@ohsu.edu<mailto:brook...@ohsu.edu>
Oregon Health Sciences University
Center for Spoken Language Understanding
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Hello,
Thanks for your reply!
When you refer to ia64, are you referring to the itanium systems?
--jason
On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> I am not finding where it says explicitly that a lustre client running
>> 1.8 will successfully be able to read and write to a set o
2.1.2 2.1.2 OK
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org
> [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] 代表 Ken Hornstein
> 发送时间: 2012年8月23日 9:00
> 收件人: Jason Brooks
> 抄送: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> 主题: Re: [Lustre-discuss]
converting bits to ascii data,
the amount of space used will increase. The question though is "how much"? It
doesn't seem reasonable for the bits to inflate THAT much.
--jason
Jason Brooks
971-238-3924
brook...@ohsu.edu<mailto:brook...@ohsu.edu>
Oregon Health Sciences Univers
Hello,
Now that the getfattr operation is done, here are the specs:
the mds filesystem (mounted as type ldiskfs) has 7.7 gigabytes in use.
however, the getfattr operation produced an ascii file that is 20 gigabytes in
size.
is this reasonable?
On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Jason Brooks
Hi,
I suffered an oss crash where my oss server had a cpu fault. I have it running
again, but I am trying to decommission it. I am migrating the data off of it
onto other ost's using the lfs find command with lfs_migrate.
It's been nearly 36 hours and about 2 terabytes have been moved. This
Hello,
I am using lustre 1.8.6, on a centos 5.5 system.
The installed version of tar (gnu, 1.15.1) is out of the centos RPM. The man
page claims that use of the —xattrs commandline option will get all of the
filesystem's extended attributes.
My question: will it get the extended attributes of
Thank you Andreas, I really appreciate you answering my question.
--jason
On Oct 31, 2012, at 8:23 PM, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am using lustre 1.8.6, on a centos 5.5 system.
>>
>>
Hello,
The question of hdfs storage via lustre has been in the foreground of my
thinking. the hadoop hdfs processes are not aware of block devices: they only
know of a filesystem mount point to begin storing data in hdfs. THUS…
If we provide a filesystem interface (say a lustre mount point) w
I have used fuse for other filesystems: its great if all you need is access to
the data, but the performance is HORRIBLE.
--jason
From: Jon Yeargers mailto:yearg...@ohsu.edu>>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2012 9:42 AM
To: Jason Brooks mailto:brook...@ohsu.edu>>,
"lustre-discuss
It is the question of how to handle redundancy that stops me from
immediately testing this idea of mine. Well, that and time, werewithal,
etc...
Hadoop is great because it uses the speed and latency of local disks to
work with data, and does not require systems be homogeneous. With the
data repl
Hello,
I am currently using lustre 1.8. I am relatively new with lustre. At the
moment, I am trying to move an mds/mgs system from one disk to another.
I used the version of tar modified by whamcloud in order to dump and restore
the filesytem. I used mkfs.lustre to create a new mds/mgs files
Hello,
I am building a 2.3.x filesystem right now, and I am looking at setting up some
active-active failover abilities to my oss's. I have been looking at Dell's
md3xxx arrays, as they have redundant controllers, and allow up to four hosts
to connect to each controller.
I can see how linux m
lled. Simply disable the
> multipathing daemon or configure it to ignore the disk arrays and use the
> vendor solution. I had no more I/O errors(Which only served to slow down the
> boot up process).
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> Hello,
>
&
Hello,
I am having trouble installing the server modules for lustre 2.1.4 and use
mellanox's OFED distribution so we may use infiniband. Would you folks look at
my procedure and results below and let me know what you think? Thanks very
much!
The mellanox ofed installation builds and install
;---
>Jeff Johnson
>Co-Founder
>Aeon Computing
>
>jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com
>www.aeoncomputing.com
>t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845
>
>4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117
>
>/* Follow us on Twitter - @AeonComputing
18 matches
Mail list logo
