M.
>
> Terry, any idea why the kernel-ib and kernel-ib-devel RPMs didn't make
> it up to the SDLC?
>
> b.
>
>
> ___
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listi
>
> b.
>
>
> ___
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
--
Jeff Blasius / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (203)432-9940 51 Prospect Rm. 011
High Perf
rogress operations using this service will fail.
Jul 8 18:34:30 c086 kernel: LustreError:
19481:0:(file.c:1052:ll_glimpse_size()) obd_enqueue returned rc -5,
returning -EIO
Jul 8 18:34:30 c086 kernel: Lustre: lustre0-OST0009-osc-0100081c2800:
Connection restored to service lustre0-OST0009
60 in flight processes. This was an open,
not an append, but it was enough contention to block access to the
entire directory.
-jeff
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 08, 2008 22:04 -0400, Jeff Blasius wrote:
>> Jul 8 1
g your question. Can you rephrase or
> elaborate?
>
> b.
>
>
> ___
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
--
Jeff Blasius / [EMAIL PROTECTE