Re: [lustre-discuss] Announce: Lustre Systems Administration Guide

2017-11-18 Thread Marcin Dulak
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Stu Midgley wrote: > Thank you both for the documentation. I know how hard it is to maintain. > > I've asked that all my admin staff to read it - even if some of it doesn't > directly apply to our environment. > > What we would like is ell organised, comprehensiv

Re: [lustre-discuss] Building Lustre from source

2017-10-10 Thread Marcin Dulak
-boun...@lists.lustre.org] *On > Behalf Of *Parag Khuraswar > *Sent:* Monday, October , 2017 2:38 PM > *To:* 'Marcin Dulak' > *Cc:* 'Lustre User Discussion Mailing List' > *Subject:* Re: [lustre-discuss] Building Lustre from source > > > > Hi, > >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Building Lustre from source

2017-10-09 Thread Marcin Dulak
Hi, You need to provide all command you used until now. Please refer to the existing threads about building from RPMS, e.g.: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/hpdd-discuss/2016-December/003048.html or start from this gist https://gist.github.com/marcindulak/ff2683c78c841f2fa562ee4412dd0a3e Cheers M

Re: [lustre-discuss] tar file of Lustre 2.10.x

2017-10-06 Thread Marcin Dulak
Hi, I would extract it from the SRPM: wget -O- https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.10.1/el7/server/SRPMS/lustre-2.10.1-1.src.rpm | rpm2cpio | cpio -idvm Marcin On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Ms. Megan Larko wrote: > Greetings! > > Is there any location from which I may "wg

Re: [lustre-discuss] ksym errors with lustre 2.9.0 rpm

2017-04-07 Thread Marcin Dulak
Maybe https://gist.github.com/marcindulak/ff2683c78c841f2fa562ee4412dd0a3e or https://lists.01.org/pipermail/hpdd-discuss/2016-December/003048.html still work. You would have to provide a full sequence of performed instructions, as in the link above. Best regards, Marcin On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4

Re: [lustre-discuss] Using Lustre

2017-02-16 Thread Marcin Dulak
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:20 PM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > These are very general questions that *should* be addressed in generally > available documentation but I may be wrong but I think they are. > > Either way to the best of my knowledge Lustre is currently only supported > on Linux, the offici

Re: [lustre-discuss] Building against kmod spl/zfs

2017-01-16 Thread Marcin Dulak
, because it still produces the kmod-lustre packages I want to use > on my cluster nodes. > > > > > > Brian Andrus > > ITACS/Research Computing > > Naval Postgraduate School > > Monterey, California > > voice: 831-656-6238 <%28831%29%20656-6238> >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Building against kmod spl/zfs

2017-01-16 Thread Marcin Dulak
finiband support in this kind of environment. Marcin > Doing it that way seems to work for me. > > > > > > Brian Andrus > > ITACS/Research Computing > > Naval Postgraduate School > > Monterey, California > > voice: 831-656-6238 <%28831%29%20656-6238&

Re: [lustre-discuss] Building against kmod spl/zfs

2017-01-13 Thread Marcin Dulak
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev wrote: > Hi Brian, > > do you use rpm based system or something else? > > > I do not use yet kmod zfs lustre (using dkms) but I use kmod zfs on other > zfs appliance. > > I case of rpm base system you need to install zfs-release-1-5 rpm to

Re: [lustre-discuss] MGS failover problem

2017-01-11 Thread Marcin Dulak
Lustre has multi-mount protection so there should be no risk for pacemaker trying to mount lustre on a secondary servicenode in case of failure of the primary node. If lustre is still mounted on the primary the mount on the secondary will fail. http://doc.lustre.org/lustre_manual.xhtml#managingfail

[lustre-discuss] many 'ksym' packages required

2016-12-27 Thread Marcin Dulak
Hi, the KSYM errors seem to be due to incompatibility between zfs used for building of lustre RPMS (probably 0.6.5.7) and the one available at http://zfsonlinux.org/ (0.6.5.8). See discussion at https://lists.01.org/pipermail/hpdd-discuss/2016-December/003037.html Marcin _