> * *
>
> *Henry Xu*,
>
> *S*ystem *C*onsultant,
>
>
>
> ___
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
--
Hung-Sheng Tsao, Ph.D.
laot...@gmail.com
http://laots
hi
when are we going to see the new updatd lustre 1.8.1.1 support matrix?
http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Lustre_Support_Matrix
only list 1.8.1
Another question
Does lustre support Servers running the latest rhel 5.3 with 1.8.1.1
but client only running rhel5.1?
Can Client also run 1.8.1.1?
ca
Does lustre support Servers running the latest rhel 5.3 with 1.8.1.1
but client only running rhel5.1?
Can Client also run 1.8.1.1?
can this configuration run OFED 1.4.1 ?
TIA
<>___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://li
Thx
L
Mellonx only provide binary for rhel 5.2 and 5.3
--- Original message ---
> From: Brian J. Murrell
> Sent: 20/10/'09, 12:19
>
> On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 12:06 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>
>> As for OFED 1.4.1, I'm not sure whether that supports RHEL 5.1 or not.
>
> From the OFED re
hi
I try to setup lustre in vbox env
I can do rhel5.3 and lustre1.8.1.1
what is better way to test ofed ?
I can do ge with iscsi storage but how do u test the IB/OFED stack?
TIA
<>___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://l
http://blogs.sun.com/manoj/entry/lustre_demo_flash
http://blogs.sun.com/manoj/entry/lustre_installation_multi_node
Carlos Santana wrote:
And is there any specific installation order for patchless client?
Could someone please share it with me?
-
CS.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Carlos San
Carlos Santana wrote:
I am a newbie to the lustre world. I have a very basic and probably
stupid question here. When we install a Lustre FS, i.e., install RPM
packages for the server side then what happens to the operating
system's file system?
os fs still support os
lustre FS will be on se
IMHO, may be one can do a HA-MDS using shared storage
all the datas are in the shared storage so U can do a failover
Ramiro Alba Queipo wrote:
HiDaniel,
By reading Chapter 15 of Lustre Operations Manual, it follows that an
MDT backup is only useful if you are changing hardwary or the like.
I a
it seems that one can use dual connected array to two nodes and use
software mirroring between the two array to give U double protection
1)HW-raid within array
2)SW raid between arrays
hth
Kevin Van Maren wrote:
Gary Gogick wrote:
Heya all,
I'm investigating potential solutions for a stor
IMHO, one just need 64-bit support
Wolfgang Stief wrote:
Hi out there!
Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons
AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I
just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and
upgrades. No perfo
hi
how do lustre handle some clients need to modify the kernel due to some
local requirement?
TIA
<>___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
raid 6 chunk size=128k the full strip size will be 128k*8 (for 10 disks
8+2 raid 6)
in Ur dd test one should use bs=128k*8, then each 8 HDD will be busy
regards
Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>
> With this RAID5 configuration Im getting:
>
> r...@a02n00:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md20 bs=128k count=
> From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org
> [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Hung-Sheng
> Tsao
> (LaoTsao)
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:50 PM
> To: Rafael David Tinoco
> Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Re: [L
13 matches
Mail list logo
