Re: [Lustre-discuss] 16T LUNs

2010-02-10 Thread Andreas Dilger
t;>> -----Original Message- >>>> From: andreas.dil...@sun.com [mailto:andreas.dil...@sun.com] On >>>> Behalf >>> Of >>>> Andreas Dilger >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 7:13 PM >>>> To: Roger Spellman >>>>

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 16T LUNs

2010-02-10 Thread David Simas
d up e2fsck time, there is a limit > to what can be done with this. > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: andreas.dil...@sun.com [mailto:andreas.dil...@sun.com] On > >> Behalf > > Of > >> Andreas Dilger > >> Sent: Tuesday, Februar

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 16T LUNs

2010-02-10 Thread Andreas Dilger
f improvements to speed up e2fsck time, there is a limit to what can be done with this. >> -Original Message- >> From: andreas.dil...@sun.com [mailto:andreas.dil...@sun.com] On >> Behalf > Of >> Andreas Dilger >> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 7:13 PM

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 16T LUNs

2010-02-10 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Roger Spellman wrote: > I see that 1.8.2 supports 16T OSTs for RHEL. A bit OT (doesn't relate specifically to sles) but relates to 16T support. We currently have 1T drives in 10+2 configuration yielding 10 TB arrays. Today we have to split this into two logical parts

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 16T LUNs

2010-02-09 Thread Andreas Dilger
On 2010-02-09, at 15:02, Roger Spellman wrote: > I see that 1.8.2 supports 16T OSTs for RHEL. > > Does anyone know when this will be supported for SLES? No, it will not, because SLES doesn't provide a very uptodate ext4 code, and a number of 16TB fixes went into ext4 late in the game. RHEL5.4

[Lustre-discuss] 16T LUNs

2010-02-09 Thread Roger Spellman
I see that 1.8.2 supports 16T OSTs for RHEL. Does anyone know when this will be supported for SLES? Is anyone currently using a 16T OST, who could share their experiences? Is it stable? Thanks. Roger Spellman Staff Engineer Terascala, Inc. 508-588-1501 www.terascala.com