Can't wait until 2.0 and SNS. I think thats the only die-hard feature
Lustre is really missing.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:19 AM, wrote:
> Michael,
>
> - "Michael Di Domenico" wrote:
>> > We are currently using e2scan and distributed rsyncs across the
>> compute farm to do the same thing wi
Michael,
- "Michael Di Domenico" wrote:
> > We are currently using e2scan and distributed rsyncs across the
> compute farm to do the same thing with Lustre v1.6/1.8 to mirror our
> main filesystem to a backup every night.
>
> Is this a script you'd be willing to share?
Sure, but it is fairl
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Daire Byrne wrote:
>
> - "Andreas Dilger" wrote:
>> > Until the replication feature is available, rsync (or a suitable
>> > replacement) is about the only way to have an independent, redundant
>> > copy of your data.
>>
>> In the 2.0 release there will be an ef
- "Andreas Dilger" wrote:
> > Until the replication feature is available, rsync (or a suitable
> > replacement) is about the only way to have an independent, redundant
> > copy of your data.
>
> In the 2.0 release there will be an efficient mechanism (Changelogs)
> along with an rsync replac
On Jul 20, 2009 23:45 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 23:41 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> > Other than DRBD and Hot standby are there any other alternatives? We
> > want to have a redundant copy of our data and was wondering if rsync
> > is the only way to accomplish this.
>
> Un
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 23:41 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> Other than DRBD and Hot standby are there any other alternatives? We
> want to have a redundant copy of our data and was wondering if rsync
> is the only way to accomplish this.
Until the replication feature is available, rsync (or a suitable
rep
Other than DRBD and Hot standby are there any other alternatives? We
want to have a redundant copy of our data and was wondering if rsync
is the only way to accomplish this.
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lust
