Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-20 Thread Barberi, Carl E
Thank you. This did help. With the concurrency set to 16, I was able to get a max write speed of 1138 MB/s. Any ideas on how we can make that faster, though? Ideally, we'd like to get to 1.5 GB/s. Carl From: Liang Zhen [mailto:li...@whamcloud.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:45 AM

Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-20 Thread Jeremy Filizetti
Am I reading your earlier post correctly that you have a single server acting as the MDS and OSS? Have you changed your peer_credits and credits for ko2iblnd kernel module on the server and client? You also mentioned changing osc.*.max_dirty_mb, you probably need to adjust osc.*.max_rpcs_in_fligh

Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-20 Thread Jeremy Filizetti
Apparently I didn't read your email very carefully since you were actually only wondering about LNET performance and not client performance. You can ignore the max_rpcs_in_flight for lnet. There used to be a srpc_peer_credits setting in lnet_selftest, not sure if it exists in your version. Should

Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-20 Thread Kevin Van Maren
While it's possible the default credits (8 as I recall) is not enough for peak performance, it seems to me that something else is wrong: Each 1MB RPC should take ~300uS (based on MPI/IB xfer rates of 3.2+ GB/s), so that means there is another 400uS overhead per RPC that is not masked with 8 conc

Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-20 Thread Jeremy Filizetti
It does seem extreme for data center IB latency but it may not be in the data center. The LNet write should take 2 RTT latencies, and 3 for reads so you could double/triple those times plus any overhead. Carl can you clarify if you are using QDR IB and/or any campus or wide area IB extenders? Je

Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-21 Thread Barberi, Carl E
-discuss@lists.Lustre.org; isaac_hu...@xyratex.com Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue It does seem extreme for data center IB latency but it may not be in the data center. The LNet write should take 2 RTT latencies, and 3 for reads so you could double/triple those

Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue

2012-02-23 Thread Isaac Huang
Monday, February 20, 2012 8:37 PM > To: Kevin Van Maren > Cc: Barberi, Carl E; lustre-discuss@lists.Lustre.org; isaac_hu...@xyratex.com > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] EXTERNAL: Re: LNET Performance Issue > > It does seem extreme for data center IB latency but it may not be in the