Re: [Lustre-discuss] Enqueue wait from MDS log

2010-01-06 Thread Andreas Dilger
On 2010-01-06, at 03:49, Tung Dam wrote: > The bad news is that i'm using lustre 1.8, do you have any idea ? > Could you tell me that how it could affect to our system or it's > just a harmless warning ? It is just a harmless warning. The message is gone in CVS, err Git, but I don't know wh

[Lustre-discuss] Enqueue wait from MDS log

2010-01-06 Thread Tung Dam
Hi list I have an issue with lustre log from our MDS, like this: * Jan 6 14:00:49 MDS1 kernel: Lustre: 19141:0:(ldlm_lockd.c:808:ldlm_server_completion_ast()) ### enqueue waittook 164s from 1262761084 ns: mds-lustre-MDT_UUID lock: 8101b6265a00/0x874ddc3670da987c lrc: 3/0,0 mode: PW/PW res

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Enqueue wait from MDS log

2010-01-06 Thread Andreas Dilger
On 2010-01-06, at 01:42, Tung Dam wrote: > I have an issue with lustre log from our MDS, like this: > > Jan 6 14:00:49 MDS1 kernel: Lustre: 19141:0:(ldlm_lockd.c: > 808:ldlm_server_completion_ast()) ### enqueue wait took 164s from > 1262761084 ns: mds-lustre-MDT_UUID lock: > 8101b6265

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Enqueue wait from MDS log

2010-01-06 Thread Tung Dam
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Tung Dam wrote: > Hi list > > I have an issue with lustre log from our MDS, like this: > * > Jan 6 14:00:49 MDS1 kernel: Lustre: > 19141:0:(ldlm_lockd.c:808:ldlm_server_completion_ast()) ### enqueue waittook > 164s from 1262761084 ns: mds-lustre-MDT_UUID lock