Thats what I am doing now. There must be cache on the MDS side on 1.6, no?
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-01-01, at 15:38, Mag Gam wrote:
>>
>> We are running 1.6.7.2 OSS and Clients. If there are 50 clients
>> accessing the same 10gig file would the 10gig file g
On 2010-01-01, at 15:38, Mag Gam wrote:
> We are running 1.6.7.2 OSS and Clients. If there are 50 clients
> accessing the same 10gig file would the 10gig file go into memory of
> the OSS or for each access it starts over? My OSS has 32gig of memory.
The OSS read-only cache feature was not introdu
We are running 1.6.7.2 OSS and Clients. If there are 50 clients
accessing the same 10gig file would the 10gig file go into memory of
the OSS or for each access it starts over? My OSS has 32gig of memory.
TIA
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss
