Re: [Lustre-discuss] Sequentialized OST mount

2011-03-16 Thread Jeremy Filizetti
> > Does any one recall that discussion? Is there a bug open on this? Was > there any resolution? > > There is a bug open in the Whamcloud JIRA that a patch. http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-26 I have not had the time to setup our test environment to test the patch, although I have included

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Sequentialized OST mount

2011-03-16 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
Thats the one. Thanks, Jason! On 03/16/2011 02:25 PM, Jason Rappleye wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2011, at 2:18 PM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote: > >> My seach-fu is failing me. >> >> I seem to recall a discussion about OST mounts being sequentialized, >> even if the mount commands are issued in paralle

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Sequentialized OST mount

2011-03-16 Thread Jason Rappleye
On Mar 16, 2011, at 2:18 PM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote: > My seach-fu is failing me. > > I seem to recall a discussion about OST mounts being sequentialized, > even if the mount commands are issued in parallel. Perhaps something > about a superblock lock being to blame. > > Does any one r

[Lustre-discuss] Sequentialized OST mount

2011-03-16 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
My seach-fu is failing me. I seem to recall a discussion about OST mounts being sequentialized, even if the mount commands are issued in parallel. Perhaps something about a superblock lock being to blame. Does any one recall that discussion? Is there a bug open on this? Was there any resolu