On 12 June 2014 08:52, Oliver Mangold wrote:
> On 11.06.2014 20:29, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> > Odds are that you would be able to do it. How well it would perform,
> > and how easy it would be to admin are other questions. :)
> >
> We did it with KVM and PCI device passthrough for the IB
On 11.06.2014 20:29, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
> Odds are that you would be able to do it. How well it would perform,
> and how easy it would be to admin are other questions. :)
>
We did it with KVM and PCI device passthrough for the IB and SAS
adapters. Works fine and with little performanc
Odds are that you would be able to do it. How well it would perform,
and how easy it would be to admin are other questions. :)
Unless you have other needs for it to be Lustre, you might consider
Ceph. I believe that Ceph is used quite commonly to serve VM images.
Chris
On 06/10/2014 03:41
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Holway
wrote:
>
> On 11 Jun 2014 14:22, "E.S. Rosenberg" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Colin Faber wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes. Many of the various VM products will work just fine with lustre.
> However they will not perform as well
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Colin Faber wrote:
> Yes. Many of the various VM products will work just fine with lustre.
> However they will not perform as well as native hw.
>
I think he means that the virtual disk images sit on lustre instead of
netapp or other storage servers...
On Jun 10,
Yes. Many of the various VM products will work just fine with lustre.
However they will not perform as well as native hw.
On Jun 10, 2014 4:42 PM, "Andrew Holway" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone had any experience running VMs on Lustre?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew
>
> __
Hello,
Has anyone had any experience running VMs on Lustre?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
