Yes, upgrading to the latest e2fsprogs is generally safe.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2011-04-06, at 8:18 PM, Larry wrote:
> Is it helpful updating the e2fsprogs to the newest version? I have
> ever had a problem during e2fsck, after updating the e2fsprogs, it's
> ok.
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:29 A
Is it helpful updating the e2fsprogs to the newest version? I have
ever had a problem during e2fsck, after updating the e2fsprogs, it's
ok.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Having the actual error messages makes this kind of problem much easier to
> solve.
>
> At a guess,
Having the actual error messages makes this kind of problem much easier to
solve.
At a guess, if the journal was removed by e2fsck you can re-add it with
"tune2fs -J size=400 /dev/{mdsdev}".
As for lfsck, if you still need to run it, you need to make sure the same
version of e2fsprogs is on al
Hello,
after a crash of our lustre system (1.6.4) we have problems repairing
the filesystem. Running the 1.6.4 e2fsck failed on the mds filesystem
so we tried with the latest 1.8 version which succeeded. But trying to
mount mds as ldiskfs filesystem failed with the standard error
message:
