On Wednesday 05 March 2008 07:42 am, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 05, 2008 01:19 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 March 2008 01:06 am, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > On Mar 04, 2008 19:52 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> > >
> > > If you are expecting to fix the filesystem, it is be
On Mar 05, 2008 01:19 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 01:06 am, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Mar 04, 2008 19:52 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> > > I have updated all clients to patched version 1.6.1, the servers still
> > > are 1.6.0.1. No lustre related error message o
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 01:06 am, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 04, 2008 19:52 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> > I have updated all clients to patched version 1.6.1, the servers still
> > are 1.6.0.1. No lustre related error message occured since (2 weeks).
> >
> > I think its reasonable (nece
On Mar 04, 2008 19:52 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> I have updated all clients to patched version 1.6.1, the servers still are
> 1.6.0.1. No lustre related error message occured since (2 weeks).
>
> I think its reasonable (necessary?) to e2fsck all osts and the mdt?
> The mdt resides on an drb
Hi,
I have updated all clients to patched version 1.6.1, the servers still are
1.6.0.1. No lustre related error message occured since (2 weeks).
I think its reasonable (necessary?) to e2fsck all osts and the mdt?
The mdt resides on an drbd device configured as failover.
I now have the followin
On Thursday 24 January 2008 08:13 pm, you wrote:
> Hello Harald,
>
> > Jan 21 18:12:51 node0010 kernel: Lustre: 5717:0:
> > (namei.c:235:ll_mdc_blocking_ast()) More than 1 alias dir 134120476 alias
> > 2 Jan 21 18:12:51 node0010 kernel: Lustre: 5717:0:
> > (namei.c:235:ll_mdc_blocking_ast()) Skippe
Hello Harald,
> Jan 21 18:12:51 node0010 kernel: Lustre: 5717:0:
> (namei.c:235:ll_mdc_blocking_ast()) More than 1 alias dir 134120476 alias 2
> Jan 21 18:12:51 node0010 kernel: Lustre: 5717:0:
> (namei.c:235:ll_mdc_blocking_ast()) Skipped 6 previous similar messages
this looks very much like a r
On Monday 21 January 2008 11:55 pm, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Jan 17 07:41:16 node0010 kernel: Lustre: 5723:0:
> > (namei.c:235:ll_mdc_blocking_ast()) More than 1 alias dir 133798800 alias
>
> A quick search in bugzilla for this error message shows bug 12123,
> which is fixed in the 1.6.1 release,
On Jan 21, 2008 18:55 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote:
> The directory is just not there! Directory or file not found.
>
> in my opinion there is no error message on the clients which is directly
> related to the problem on our node0010 today I have seen this problem a
> several time. Mostly the direc
On Monday 21 January 2008 05:44 pm, you wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2008 17:33:31 Harald van Pee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is lustre 1.6.0.1 on redhat 4 update 4.
> > With debian etch patchless clients and debian kernels 2.6.18.
> > All are AMD64 bit.
> > We use 1 MGS, 1 MDT and 5 OSS with toge
On Monday 21 January 2008 17:33:31 Harald van Pee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is lustre 1.6.0.1 on redhat 4 update 4.
> With debian etch patchless clients and debian kernels 2.6.18.
> All are AMD64 bit.
> We use 1 MGS, 1 MDT and 5 OSS with together 10 OST.
>
> The cluster is running since roughly 6 month
Hi,
this is lustre 1.6.0.1 on redhat 4 update 4.
With debian etch patchless clients and debian kernels 2.6.18.
All are AMD64 bit.
We use 1 MGS, 1 MDT and 5 OSS with together 10 OST.
The cluster is running since roughly 6 monthes, no problems on the server side
up to know!
The only problem on cli
12 matches
Mail list logo
