[Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-04 Thread Ms. Megan Larko
Greetings, My present solution for my corosync/pacemaker control of my Lustre filesystem availability was to make a Linux Standards Base (LSB) Sys V init script for my IB0 service and then I could use the corosync primitive to control the IB network (and therefore the MGS). Being that I did not

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-02 Thread Isaac Huang
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:04:02AM -0400, Ms. Megan Larko wrote: .. What steps should I take to generate a successful lctl ping a.b.c.d? There must be a LNet instance running over SOCKLND on a.b.c.d. - Isaac ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list

[Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-01 Thread Ms. Megan Larko
Greetings! I am working with Lustre-2.1.2 on RHEL 6.2. First I configured it using the standard defaults over TCP/IP. Everything worked very nicely usnig a real, static --mgsnode=a.b.c.x value which was the actual IP of the MGS/MDS system1 node. I am now trying to integrate it with

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-01 Thread Jeff Johnson
Megan, lnet pings aren't the same as tcpip/udp pings. An lnet ping 'lctl ping' would need to touch an active lnet instance on the target address. I don't think you can bind lnet to a pacemaker virtual IP but I'll let someone smarter than me on this list confirm or correct me. In any event an