Re: [Lustre-discuss] lfs --obd discrepancy to lctl dl (1.8.3)

2010-08-12 Thread Heiko Schröter
Am Freitag 13 August 2010, um 03:07:31 schrieb Christopher J. Morrone: Thanks a lot. "lfs osts" is the one i've been looking for. and if this one would print out the IP as well ... but i think this is asking for too much Regards Heiko > On 08/11/2010 01:38 AM, Daniel Kobras wrote: > > > O

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lfs --obd discrepancy to lctl dl (1.8.3)

2010-08-12 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
On 08/11/2010 01:38 AM, Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:53:01AM +0200, Heiko Schröter wrote: >> According to "lfs find" the stripe should be on scia-OST0017_UUID. "lfs >> gestripe" reports to have it on obdidx 23 , which is scia-OST0014 according >> to lctl dl. Which one is true

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lfs --obd discrepancy to lctl dl (1.8.3)

2010-08-11 Thread Daniel Kobras
Hi! On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:53:01AM +0200, Heiko Schröter wrote: > According to "lfs find" the stripe should be on scia-OST0017_UUID. "lfs > gestripe" reports to have it on obdidx 23 , which is scia-OST0014 according > to lctl dl. Which one is true ? lctl dl returns a list of all Lustre compo

[Lustre-discuss] lfs --obd discrepancy to lctl dl (1.8.3)

2010-08-11 Thread Heiko Schröter
Hello, lfs prints different obd(idx) compared to lctl dl. We use single striping. cluster1 tmp # lfs find --obd scia-OST0017_UUID /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_40582088_00071_42209_1158.N1 /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_40582088_0