Hot from our test bench - kernel 4.5.0 still reports itself to be lustre
2.3.64 and still suffers this issue...
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Dilger, Andreas
wrote:
> The version of Lustre in the upstream kernel for _features_ is pre-2.4,
> but it has a large number of bug fixes since then.
The version of Lustre in the upstream kernel for _features_ is pre-2.4, but it
has a large number of bug fixes since then. That means it can connect to most
normal Lustre servers, but does not have HSM or DNE or any of the major
features added in 2.4 and later.
That is a restriction placed upo
re-sending to lustre-discuss.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Perepechko
wrote:
> Hi
>
> You can find the patch in LU-8047.
>
> Although it helps with the mdtest performance drop from LU-4398, it is also
> probably makes sense to update LU-4398 and make it return a lookup/layout
> lock f
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 7:27 PM, E.S. Rosenberg
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Several of our users ran into the "Text file busy" error described in
> LU-6232 (and possibly related to LU-4398 and LU-4429).
>
> Has there been any progress on this issue?
LU-4398 was landed once and then reverted due to
So what version of lustre is built in to kernel 4.5? We are switching
distro soon at the very least to kernel 4.16 + userspace 2.7 and now would
definitely be the best time to still decide to use a newer kernel.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:28 PM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
> The servers are lustre
The servers are lustre 2.5.3 on CentOS 6.5 from the official RPMs
The problem was tested on 2 clients, all running Debian with a kernel we
built.
- kernel 3.17.8, according to /proc/fs/lustre/version - 2.3.64, the
userspace programs (mount etc) are 2.5.3
- kernel 4.1.6, /proc/fs/lustre/version - 2
What version of Lustre are you running? I thought we fixed that problem?
Cheers, Andreas
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 12:28, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Several of our users ran into the "Text file busy" error described in LU-6232
> (and possibly related to LU-4398 and LU-4429).
>
> Has the
Hi all,
Several of our users ran into the "Text file busy" error described in
LU-6232 (and possibly related to LU-4398 and LU-4429).
Has there been any progress on this issue?
I feel pretty dumb when I have to explain this issue to them and how to
work around it
Thanks,
Eli
Background for t
