Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.10.1 client fails to mount on 2.9 backend

2017-11-21 Thread Christopher Johnston
gt; *To: *lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > *Subject: *[lustre-discuss] 2.10.1 client fails to mount on 2.9 backend > > > > Just tested the new 2.10.1 client against one of my fileservers where I > have 2.9 running. Works with 2.10.0 but not 2.10.1, is this expe

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.10.1 client fails to mount on 2.9 backend

2017-11-17 Thread Chris Horn
7, 2017 at 3:17 PM To: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> Subject: [lustre-discuss] 2.10.1 client fails to mount on 2.9 backend Just tested the new 2.10.1 client against one of my fileservers where I have 2.9 running. Works with 2.10.0 but not 2.10.1, is this expected?

[lustre-discuss] 2.10.1 client fails to mount on 2.9 backend

2017-11-17 Thread Christopher Johnston
Just tested the new 2.10.1 client against one of my fileservers where I have 2.9 running. Works with 2.10.0 but not 2.10.1, is this expected? # mount -t lustre 172.30.69.90:/qstore /mnt mount.lustre: mount 172.30.69.90:/qstore at /mnt failed: No such file or directory Is the MGS specification