Lustre newbie here (1 month). Lustre 2.10.3, CentOS 7.4, ZFS 0.7.5. All
networking is 10 GbE.
I am building a test Lustre filesystem. So far, I have two OSS's, each
with 30 disks of 2 TB each, all in a single zpool per OSS. Everything
works well, and was suprisingly easy to build. Thus, two OS
On 03/15/2018 04:48 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> If I go with one OST per system (one zpool comprising 8 x 6 RAIDZ2
> vdevs), I will have a lustre f/s comprised of two 60 TB OST's and two
> 192 TB OST's (minus RAIDZ2 overhead). This is obviously a big mismatch
> between OST sizes.
Depending on how f
On Mar 15, 2018, at 09:48, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> Lustre newbie here (1 month). Lustre 2.10.3, CentOS 7.4, ZFS 0.7.5. All
> networking is 10 GbE.
>
> I am building a test Lustre filesystem. So far, I have two OSS's, each with
> 30 disks of 2 TB each, all in a single zpool per OSS. Everythin
Doesn't PFL also 'solve'/mitigate this issue in the sense that a file
doesn't have to remain restricted to the OST(s) it started on?
(And as such balancing will even continue as files grow)
Regards,
Eli
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Dilger, Andreas
wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 09:48, Steve Th
.
* Patrick
From: lustre-discuss on behalf of
"E.S. Rosenberg"
Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 2:46 PM
To: "Dilger, Andreas"
Cc: "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org"
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Mixed size OST's
Doesn't PFL also 'solve'/mitigate th
