On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:46 AM Kevin M. Hildebrand wrote:
> We appear to be tripping over the same issues reported recently by
> Tung-Han Hsieh and Simon Guilbault, namely that cur_grant_bytes is being
> reduced to a very small value and causing abysmal performance.
>
I'm curious if anyone enco
Hi Kevin, Meg, Nathan,
I'm interested in some of the details about how you're hitting this with
an eye to reproducing. Could you share any details about the following:
- Interconnect
- Client count
- Workload
Thanks!
-Aaron
On 12/8/20 1:46 PM, Kevin M. Hildebrand wrote:
We appear to be tr
Greetings K Hildebrand!
Running Lustre 2.12.5 on the clients I have observed the same behavior. On
some OSTs, the osc.*.cur_grants_bytes drop to the mid-3000's! That is
lower than the 70 numbers displayed in the posts of others on this
list. Concurrently, the same OSTs displaying the low cu
We appear to be tripping over the same issues reported recently by Tung-Han
Hsieh and Simon Guilbault, namely that cur_grant_bytes is being reduced to
a very small value and causing abysmal performance.
For example, OSTs 0, 1, and 4 are having poor performance on this client
running Lustre 2.12.5:
