Andreas,
Thank you again for your detailed reply and time, I will have a look
further at the lustre IO kit and hopefully, get to the bottom of things.
Cheers,
Finn
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 at 00:52, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Finn,
> I can't really say for sure where the performance limitation in your
Finn,
I can't really say for sure where the performance limitation in your system is
coming from.
You'd have to re-run the tests against the local ldiskfs filesystem to see how
the performance compares to with that of Lustre. The important part of
benchmark testing is to systematically build
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for taking the time to reply with such a detailed response.
I have taken your advice on board and made some changes. Firstly, I have
swapped from ZFS and am now using striped LVM groups (Including the P4800X
instead of using it as a cache drive). I have also modified io500.sh
On Apr 16, 2022, at 22:51, Finn Rawles Malliagh via lustre-discuss
mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have just set up a three-node Lustre configuration, and initial testing shows
what I think are slow results. The current configuration is 2 OSS, 1 MDS-MGS;
each OSS/MGS
Hi all,
I have just set up a three-node Lustre configuration, and initial testing
shows what I think are slow results. The current configuration is 2 OSS, 1
MDS-MGS; each OSS/MGS has 4x Intel P3600, 1x Intel P4800, Intel E810 100Gbe
eth, 2x 6252, 380GB dram
I am using Lustre 2.12.8, ZFS 0.7.13, ic
