Re: [lustre-discuss] State of the upstream client

2017-05-24 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > On May 23, 2017, at 11:15, E.S. Rosenberg > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > So I may be asking for something that will anyhow be dealt with at LUG > 2017 but I actually would like to know.

Re: [lustre-discuss] State of the upstream client

2017-05-23 Thread Dilger, Andreas
On May 23, 2017, at 11:15, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > > Hi all, > So I may be asking for something that will anyhow be dealt with at LUG 2017 > but I actually would like to know. > > At LUG 2016 there was a talk that sounded very hopeful that the upstream > version of

[lustre-discuss] State of the upstream client

2017-05-23 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Hi all, So I may be asking for something that will anyhow be dealt with at LUG 2017 but I actually would like to know. At LUG 2016 there was a talk that sounded very hopeful that the upstream version of lustre was taking leaps and bounds to being in sync with the main Lustre project. Where are