Re: [lustre-discuss] fetching a histogram of idx counts

2016-03-01 Thread Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:17 PM, John White wrote: > > I’m trying to figure out an efficient way to get a global count of > objects per idx. I can do it through an horribly inefficient find + lfs > getstripe, but I’d really like to figure out a way not to have to touch the > posix layer o

Re: [lustre-discuss] fetching a histogram of idx counts

2016-03-01 Thread Dilger, Andreas
Running "lfs df -i" is probably what you want? Cheers, Andreas > On Mar 2, 2016, at 05:18, John White wrote: > > Good Afternoon Folks, >I’m trying to figure out an efficient way to get a global count of objects > per idx. I can do it through an horribly inefficient find + lfs getstripe,

[lustre-discuss] fetching a histogram of idx counts

2016-03-01 Thread John White
Good Afternoon Folks, I’m trying to figure out an efficient way to get a global count of objects per idx. I can do it through an horribly inefficient find + lfs getstripe, but I’d really like to figure out a way not to have to touch the posix layer of lustre to do this. Any ideas?