Re: [lustre-discuss] proper procedure after MDT kernel panic

2016-08-11 Thread Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 5:42 AM, E.S. Rosenberg > wrote: > > Our MDT suffered a kernel panic (which I will post separately), the OSSs > stayed alive but the MDT was out for some time while nodes still tried to > interact with lustre. > > So I have several questions: > a. what happens to proces

Re: [lustre-discuss] proper procedure after MDT kernel panic

2016-08-11 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
What is the normal amount of time I should expect e2fsck --mdsdb to be running (1T MDT)? (So far it's running quite a few hours) Thanks, Eli On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:42 PM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > Hi all, > Our MDT suffered a kernel panic (which I will post separately), the OSSs > stayed alive

[lustre-discuss] proper procedure after MDT kernel panic

2016-08-11 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Hi all, Our MDT suffered a kernel panic (which I will post separately), the OSSs stayed alive but the MDT was out for some time while nodes still tried to interact with lustre. So I have several questions: a. what happens to processes/reading writing during such an event (if they already have hand