You're totally correct!
De : lustre-discuss au nom de Sid
Young via lustre-discuss
Répondre à : Sid Young
Date : vendredi 26 février 2021 à 00:45
À : lustre-discuss
Objet : [EXTERNAL] [lustre-discuss] servicenode /failnode
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization
G'Day all,
I'm rebuilding my Lustre cluster again and in doing so I am trying to
understand the role of the --servicenode option when creating an OST. There
is an example in the doco shown as this:
[root@rh7z-oss1 system]# mkfs.lustre --ost \
> --fsname demo \
> --index 0 \
> --mgsnode
All,
I notice there seems to be a difference between putting all your nids as comma
separated values for servicenode/failnode and putting them as separate entries
for each one.
Here is an output of a dryrun against an OST that was created using multiple
--servicenode= options. I ran tune2fs
