day, March 07, 2013 6:09 PM
> To: Colin Faber
> Cc: Alfonso Pardo ; Ben Evans ; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] delete a "undeletable" file
>
> You could just unlink it instead. That will work when rm fails.
>
> bob
>
> On 3/7/
quot;?
THANKS!
-Mensaje original-
From: Bob Ball
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 6:09 PM
To: Colin Faber
Cc: Alfonso Pardo ; Ben Evans ; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] delete a "undeletable" file
You could just unlink it instead. That will work when
You could just unlink it instead. That will work when rm fails.
bob
On 3/7/2013 11:10 AM, Colin Faber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If the file is disassociated with an OST which is offline, bring the OST
> back online, if the OST object it self is missing then you can remove
> the file using 'unlink' rather
Hi,
If the file is disassociated with an OST which is offline, bring the OST
back online, if the OST object it self is missing then you can remove
the file using 'unlink' rather than 'rm' to unlink the object meta data.
If you want to try and recover the missing OST object an lfs getstripe
aga
The snarky reply would be to use Emacs.
More seriously:
When I see something like ?? in the attributes for a file, my first thought
is that the group_upcall on the filesystem is not correct, so permissions are
broken. If you can log on as root, you may be able to see it clearly.
If that d
