Oh dear, oh dear, more misinformation.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Arthur Ness (boston) wrote:
Matanya Ophee wrote:
At 01:45 PM 10/28/2003 -0500, Arthur Ness (boston)
71162.751ompuserve.com wrote:
Oh dear. There's an awful lot to comment about in Goran's message.
I believe I am in
At 01:00 PM 10/29/2003 +, Tim Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MOpheeCareful. The concordances were _mainly_ compiled by Tim Crawford,
not by you.
TOTAL NONSENSE, Matanya. Please check your facts before making a stupid
assertion of this kind. My contribution was almost totally
Kevlar and carbon sandwiching are also popular in high-end table tennis
rackets, which can cost $100-$150.
Does anyone prefer the sound of low-tension strings? Or is it as simple
as:
high tension =
more volume, better tone, less slapping, harder to play
low tension =
less volume, worse tone, more slapping, easier to play
I'm from south Texas, where gut is not very
Dear lutenists
Some days ago I got my first try of the new wound strings on nylgut
- 'DE' type by Aquila. Direct link to the description is
http://www.aquilacorde.com/catalogo7bis.htm , their Aquila's general
page is http://www.aquilacorde.com/
I have only had time to try those strings on my
Dear Herbert,
you asked:
Does anyone prefer the sound of low-tension strings? Or is it as simple
as:
high tension = more volume, better tone, less slapping, harder to play
low tension = less volume, worse tone, more slapping, easier to play
I'm from south Texas, where gut is not
At 01:11 PM 10/29/03, you wrote:
Does anyone prefer the sound of low-tension strings? Or is it as simple
as:
high tension =
more volume, better tone, less slapping, harder to play
low tension =
less volume, worse tone, more slapping, easier to play
Herb,
