Continuo Question

2004-03-09 Thread David Rastall
Thanks for all the information on continuo. You guys know everything! ;-) Regards, David Rastall

Re: Why paintings but no lutes?

2004-03-09 Thread Daniel F Heiman
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:58:28 -0600 (CST) Herbert Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Support also comes ... from paintings > > It seems that much of the evidence about early lutes comes from > paintings, > which are about as flammable and fragile as lutes. Have we, in > general, > lost the

sunday lunch and hot air

2004-03-09 Thread bill
dear jon - i'd meant sunday's missive to be read by everyone but - all things considered - i'm glad it just went to you. there's no end of persnickety people in any given area and while i'm sure lute enthusiasts have more than their fair share, i'll just have to live with it in any case. her

Re: why paintings but no lutes

2004-03-09 Thread Jon Murphy
Bill, With all due respect, > at the risk of causing offense - paintings have more value. if the mob > was at the gate and there was only seconds to spare, i think i'd opt > for the caneletto too. Paintings have more value in the market, and therefore more currency. If the mob is at the gates o

Re: Why Paintings but no lutes

2004-03-09 Thread Ron Fletcher
It is sad that instruments seem to lose value over the years. The instruments one finds at car-boot sales and auctions were once someones pride and joy. Yet go for so little. The lute in it's day was the equivalent to the piano. If one could afford it, they had to have lessons, as well as a c