Dear Sean;
I suspect Craig meant 17th century guitar i.e., baroque guitar
(1600's) as in Corbetta, Sans and possibly de Visee.
All the Best,
Gary Digman
- Original Message -
From: lutesmith
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 16:35:30 -0700
To:
Dear Craig,
Strictly speaking the 16th-century guitar does not have a re-entrant
tuning. The 4th course is tuned in octaves, but the presence of the
lower octave means that the tuning is not re-entrant.
Perhaps one of the most surprising re-entrant tunings is one for the
violin used by Heinrich B
At 03:59 PM 6/6/04, Craig Robert Pierpont wrote:
> I know that reentrant tuning is common for 16c guitars
Hmmm, I haven't seen any evidence of reentrant tunings in ren. guitars.
They are standardly tuned to the same intervals as the inner 4 courses of
the 6-c lute w/ the top guitar string o
I know that reentrant tuning is common for 16c guitars and citterns. Sometimes it is
somewhat camoflaged by the use of a bourdon which makes the course both lower and
higher than the next course.
Craig
Craig R. Pierpont
Another Era Lutherie
www.anotherera.com
bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not just lutes. It's a constant problem for harpmakers also and, I suspect, any
easily shipable product selling for over $1000.
Craig
Craig R. Pierpont
Another Era Lutherie
www.anotherera.com
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new
Thanks!!! This is quite fascinating: PARDUNE/PANDORE, BARDUNE/BANDURE etc.
RT
> From: "Tadeusz Czechak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bardon or bardun /Czech/ ; plural - barduny = vernacular name of medieval
> lute , from mid-high-german "pardune".
> Free translanion of quoted sentence will be - even
Roman,
That's an interesting site. Thanks,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LUTE-LIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 11:49 AM
Subject: Ukr. Lutes @ Lissberg-Ortenberg Festival
> The festival site has some interesting recordin
Dear Bill and All:
Perhaps what you've heard about re-entrant tuning relates to medieval
music. Christopher Page has written convincingly about such tunings on the
vielle (early fiddle, not hurdy-gurdy), which by extension may also apply
to the citole, which was considered in its latter days a
The festival site has some interesting recordings, FYPD.
RT
http://www.das-drehleier.net/seiten/KOBSAREN-MUSIK.htm
> But I do well respect if someone decides to use the music as a private
> entertainment. And even when playing in public it could be that you are
> playing for yourself - a good way to reduce stage-freight BTW.
I think the latter can only be alleviated by the imposition of customs
duties and excis
Yes, but in this country if you ask someone: "Do you like Kipling?", you'll
get an answer: "I don't know, how does one kiple?". Hence the dictum.
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://polyhymnion.org/swv
>
> which would be Wittgenstein ...
> Thomas
>>> if, however, criticism of this behavior
Dear Arto,
you know - I am playing for others, too, but why shouldn't it be me for
whom I perform?
It could also be me to whom I am "sending a message". Not so difficult
as to "touch another one's hand" - there is a certain resistance which
needs to be bettered to play for others as in your analog
I received very comprehensive answers from Stewart McCoy and Arthur Ness
which I think made it on the list (unless I misunderstand your
question). Here is the summary:
What you have is the facsimile edition of the lute book copied by
Mikulás
Smala z Lebensdorf (Nickolaus Schmall of Lebensdorf), sc
I received very comprehensive answers from Stewart McCoy and Arthur Ness
which I think made it on the list (unless I misunderstand your
question). Here is the summary:
What you have is the facsimile edition of the lute book copied by
Mikulás
Smala z Lebensdorf (Nickolaus Schmall of Lebensdorf), sc
Hi Daniel,
which book or Manuscript is the basis of your edition?
Best wishes
Thomas
Am Mit, 2004-06-02 um 12.58 schrieb Daniel Shoskes:
> I recently bought a few lute items from an antiquarian bookseller and
> one item is completely unknown to me. It is a facsimile published in
> 1968 of "Lou
which would be Wittgenstein ...
Thomas
Am Mit, 2004-06-02 um 13.23 schrieb Roman Turovsky:
> > if, however, criticism of this behavior is based on an understanding
> > that "they (the coalition) should know better" then i suggest you read
> > rudyard kipling's "white man's burden " to experience
another blot that's appeared on my e-landscape lately are the returned,
undelivered letters that i never sent. it's worrying to think of
what's being sent where with my name on it.
i count myself lucky to have something other than windows. i don't
know how long it will last but the majority o
17 matches
Mail list logo
