[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread corun
Mrs. Krabappel: Embiggens? I never heard that word before moving to Springfield. Miss Hoover: I don't know why, it's a perfectly cromulent word. At 08:06 PM 3/16/2006, guy_and_liz Smith wrote: >`When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it means >just what I choose it to

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread guy_and_liz Smith
`When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.' Lewis Carroll - Original Message - From: "Sean Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:16 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: I saw my lady

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread Sean Smith
It was a poor imagination that could think of but one way to spell a uuord. Sean guy_and_liz Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oops. Didn't read it very carefully. I think the extra s's are just archaic usages. English spelling wasn't very systematic back then. - Original Message ---

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread adS
Arto Wikla wrote: > Dear David, > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, LGS-Europe wrote: > >> ..joyful looks excells. >> Tears kills the heart... >> >> What's with the s-es after the verbs? 'Looks' and 'tears' (noun, for sure in >> the contaxt) are plural, so I would expect 'excell' and 'kill'. > > Just an un

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread bill kilpatrick
.. sounds like gollum. - bills-es --- LGS-Europe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > third verse: > > ..joyful looks excells. > Tears kills the heart... > > What's with the s-es after the verbs? 'Looks' and > 'tears' (noun, for sure in > the contaxt) are plural, so I would expect 'excell' > and 'kill

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread guy_and_liz Smith
Oops. Didn't read it very carefully. I think the extra s's are just archaic usages. English spelling wasn't very systematic back then. - Original Message - From: "guy_and_liz Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LGS-Europe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Arto Wikla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Lute net"

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread guy_and_liz Smith
"Look" can also be used as a noun, as in "I gave him a dirty look." I think that's how he's using it here. In that case, "looks" is just the plural of "look". Guy - Original Message - From: "Arto Wikla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LGS-Europe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Lute net" Sent: Thu

[LUTE] Re: I saw my lady weep

2006-03-16 Thread Arto Wikla
Dear David, On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, LGS-Europe wrote: > ..joyful looks excells. > Tears kills the heart... > > What's with the s-es after the verbs? 'Looks' and 'tears' (noun, for sure in > the contaxt) are plural, so I would expect 'excell' and 'kill'. Just an uneducated guess and speculation: s

[LUTE] Re: summer school in Tuscany

2006-03-16 Thread Nancy Carlin
Paul Beier has asked me to forward a note about an upcoming opportunity to study lute in a magnificent setting: >July 25-30 Lute course with Paul Beier at the Ancient Music at Monte San >Savino Summer School. Monte San Savino is a medieval city in Tuscany near >Arezzo (see www.comune.monte-san-s

[LUTE] Re: Tinctoris

2006-03-16 Thread Nancy Carlin
The music I was originally talking about was "Carmen's Whistle" by John Johnson, which I am playing on orpharion - wire strings which can easily be pulled out of tune with less than precise left hand fingering. Nancy >On Mar 13, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Nancy Carlin wrote: > > > Possible > > reasons fo

[LUTE] Re: Tinctoris

2006-03-16 Thread Sean Smith
This is in his Regola Rubertina (1542). I'm sorry, Ed, I don't have it in front of me for the details. Sean On Mar 16, 2006, at 3:14 AM, Ed Durbrow wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Sean Smith wrote: > >> Ganassi (c1530) give lots of >> different different tunings for viols w/ different m

[LUTE] Re: Tinctoris

2006-03-16 Thread Ed Durbrow
> >> When some kind of meantone tuning was used this could explain the >> use of >> the 5th fret. > > Not for a fifth fret on the sixth course in meantone fretting. Same > as open > 5th course. In fact, I can't think of a temperament where the same note would be a different pitch. I was ta

[LUTE] test, sorry

2006-03-16 Thread Clauss Gilbert
-Message d'origine- De : LGS-Europe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoye : jeudi 16 mars 2006 12:47 A : lute list Objet : [LUTE] Re: Tinctoris > When some kind of meantone tuning was used this could explain the use of > the > 5th fret. Not for a fifth fret on the sixth course in meantone

[LUTE] Re: Tinctoris

2006-03-16 Thread Taco Walstra
On Thursday 16 March 2006 12:19, Ed Durbrow wrote: > On Mar 13, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Nancy Carlin wrote: > > Possible > > reasons for this are that it was written out as part of someone > > lute lesson > > on how to play these chords, or that there was something about the > > intonation being better i

[LUTE] Re: Tinctoris

2006-03-16 Thread Ed Durbrow
On Mar 13, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Nancy Carlin wrote: > Possible > reasons for this are that it was written out as part of someone > lute lesson > on how to play these chords, or that there was something about the > intonation being better in these configurations. However, I can't > imagine > the

[LUTE] Re: Tinctoris

2006-03-16 Thread Ed Durbrow
On Mar 13, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Sean Smith wrote: > Ganassi (c1530) give lots of > different different tunings for viols w/ different missing strings and > we know that he was a lutenist, too. How do we know that? Sounds interesting. Ed Durbrow Saitama, Japan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www9.plala.or