[LUTE] Re: Are lutes too fragile to improve with age?

2007-03-18 Thread Edward Martin
Excellent observations, Martin. I agree, in that I have a few instruments that are 20 + years old, and they seem too have improved with age all of them. They seem to have improved depth sweetness of tone, which in my book is quite desirable. Does anyone have ideas about the proper way to

[LUTE] Re: Are lutes too fragile to improve with age?

2007-03-18 Thread Alan Barnosky
Before I bought my instrument, I played an instructors lute that he rarely used, he was more of a guitarist. But he constantly said that since I was playing the instrument, the lute just sounded better as a whole. I was using it every day for a couple hours for two months;he'd just pick it up

[LUTE] Re: Are lutes too fragile to improve with age?

2007-03-16 Thread Ed Durbrow
On Mar 17, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Herbert Ward wrote: I've heard that lutes, due to the thinness of the wood in their soundboard, do not improve with age like violins, and that, in fact, an old lute will have an OK bass and treble, but be weak in the middle courses. After hearing Jacob Lindberg's

[LUTE] Re: Are lutes too fragile to improve with age?

2007-03-16 Thread David Rastall
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Herbert Ward wrote: I've heard that lutes, due to the thinness of the wood in their soundboard, do not improve with age like violins, and that, in fact, an old lute will have an OK bass and treble, but be weak in the middle courses. I'm sure that depends on a lot