On Jul 25, 2007, at 6:11 AM, David Tayler wrote:
> I do think we have to get away from any idea that one style is better,
> or more "authentic", that is the undercurrent that prevents us from
> exploring all the possibilities of the instrument, limiting us
> somewhat to Historically Blurry Perform
in history, i.e. thumb under v. thumb
out, nails
v. flesh, hand extended v. hand near bridge, etc?
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "David Tayler" [2]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" [3]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:11 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Capirola
h, hand extended v. hand near bridge, etc?
>
> Gary
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Tayler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:11 AM
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Capirola question, now lu
etc?
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "David Tayler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu"
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:11 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Capirola question, now lute & classical guitar
> Stephan hat geschrieben:
> As far as I can
In a message dated 7/25/07 1:01:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> it's interesting to see that
> it still can be reasonable to play lute instruments with guitar technique
> (with only minor
> adjustments).
>
While I may be wrong, I believe that Gary was not referring to playing the
lute wit
Stephan hat geschrieben:
As far as I can see, lute and guitar are as separated in the
conservatories and so on as
cembalo and piano, probably even more, because you still have some
pianists who
occasionaly try to accompany someone on the cembalo. While we usually
think that the HIP
movement has