Thank you! Interestingly that "beginning" does make more sense to me
when played only when the piece is repeated. It makes me wonder if
Vidal really meant that this last strain is played as a beginning of
the piece on both times or only on the second time.
G. C. kirjoitti 25.9.2020
Did you mean like this?
--Sarge
On 9/25/2020 09:13, Jussi-Pekka Lajunen wrote:
> Thank you! Interestingly that "beginning" does make more sense to me
> when played only when the piece is repeated. It makes me wonder if
> Vidal really meant that this last strain is played as a beginning
I was responding to this: "Vidal obviously forgot to write the beginning
of the pavan, and adds the bars at the end of the piece."
Like I said, it makes more sense to me, musically, to play that section
only before the preceding bars are repeated, but I admit that the
wording of the Vidal's in
So maybe like this?
--Sarge
On 9/26/2020 14:53, Jussi-Pekka Lajunen wrote:
> I was responding to this: "Vidal obviously forgot to write the
> beginning of the pavan, and adds the bars at the end of the piece."
>
> Like I said, it makes more sense to me, musically, to play that
> section only befo
