> Passacaglia
> (It.; Fr. passacaille; Ger. passacalia; It. passacaglio, passagallo, 
> passacagli, passacaglie; Sp. pasacalle, passacalle).
>
> In 19th- and 20th-century music, a set of ground-bass or ostinato 
> variations, usually of a serious character; in the earliest sources, a 
> short, improvised ritornello between the strophes of a song. The term is 
> sometimes used interchangeably with ‘chaconne’ (the forms ‘chaconne’ and 
> ‘passacaglia’ are used throughout this article regardless of the national 
> tradition under discussion). This article concentrates on the early years 
> of the passacaglia, when the term had a quite distinct meaning. Its 
> subsequent history, which largely parallels that of the chaconne, is 
> summarized here; the two genres and their close relationship are explored 
> in greater detail in the article Chaconne.
>
> 1. Beginnings in Spain and Italy.
>
> 2. Italy from 1627.
>
> 3. Later history in Spain.
>
> 4. France.
>
> 5. Germany.
>
> 6. England.
>
> 7. After 1800.
>
> BIBLIOGRAPHY
>
> ALEXANDER SILBIGER
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 1. Beginnings in Spain and Italy.
> The passacaglia appears to have originated in early 17th-century Spain as 
> the pasacalle, a brief improvisation (usually barely more than a few 
> rhythmically strummed cadential chords) that guitarists played between the 
> strophes of a song, somewhat in the nature of a vamp. The term comes from 
> pasar (to walk) and calle (street), possibly deriving from outdoor 
> performances or from a practice of popular musicians to take a few steps 
> during these interludes. The first references to pasacalles appear in 
> Spanish literature in about 1605; in certain contexts the term seems to 
> have been used interchangeably with Paseo.
>
> The term was soon exported to France and Italy, at first, again, to allude 
> to ritornellos (or riprese) improvised between song strophes. As with the 
> chaconne, the earliest written examples are found in Italy in alfabeto 
> (chord) guitar tablatures, and take the form of brief, rhythmic chord 
> progressions outlining a cadential formula, most commonly I–IV–V–I or an 
> elaboration of it (ex.1a). The progressions usually appear in a range of 
> keys, rhythms and strumming patterns, and in duple as well as triple time; 
> their purpose appears to be primarily pedagogical. In Italy ‘passacaglio’ 
> was most often used to refer to a single statement of a chord scheme, and 
> the plural ‘passacagli’ for a succession or collection of more than one 
> statement; but both terms, as well as the feminine passacaglia and its 
> plural passacaglie, as well as variants like passagallo, passagalli, 
> passachaglie and numerous other spellings, were used with little 
> distinction throughout the century.
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 2. Italy from 1627.
> No examples of notated compositions entitled passacagli (or one of its 
> variants) other than the guitar-strumming formulae can be dated before 
> 1627, when Frescobaldi published a Partite sopra passacagli for keyboard, 
> along with a Partite sopra la ciaccona. It is not clear whether he should 
> be credited with the creation of the passacaglia as an independent musical 
> genre (as opposed to an improvised ritornello for another composition), 
> but the 1627 set contains many of the characteristics of the numerous 
> passacaglias for all kinds of instrumental and vocal combinations that 
> appeared in subsequent years. The newer passacaglias are typically in the 
> form of continuous (linked) variations over a bass that may itself be 
> subject to considerable variation. The old I–IV–V–I strumming formula is 
> expanded into innumerable variants, often in the form of elaborations of a 
> descending tetrachord bass (e.g. i–v6–iv76–V), usually with the metrical 
> phrase remaining as four groups of three beats (ex.1b). Chromatic 
> intermediary steps are frequent, as are other digressions, as well as 
> ascending versions (e.g. i–VII6–i6–iv–V). The earlier notion of the 
> passacaglia as an improvised ritornello, sometimes on a specified bass, 
> survived for some time, and is encountered, for example, in Monteverdi’s 
> L’incoronazione 
> di Poppea (1642). No doubt connected with this practice is a continuing 
> tradition of presenting sets of passacaglias for the guitar in a full 
> range of modes or keys, both major and minor, thus providing the player 
> with models and exercises for improvising preludes and interludes of 
> arbitrary length. A similar purpose may have been intended for a 
> collection of 44 anonymous and untitled variation sets for keyboard on 
> descending bass patterns (in I-Rvat Chigi Q IV 27, a manuscript probably 
> associated with Frescobaldi and his pupils). The pieces are ordered by 
> key, ascending by step from C, and include sets in both duple and triple 
> time; those in triple time closely resemble Frescobaldi’s passacaglias. 
> Improvised guitar interludes continued to be called ‘passagalli’ in the 
> folk music of some areas of Italy into the 19th century (Hudson, 1981, 
> p.281).
>
> In its new guise as an independent variation chain, the passacaglia shared 
> many features with the chaconne, including the linking of variations, 
> cadential articulation and the use of triple metre. Yet Frescobaldi’s 
> passacaglias also show some distinctions (not necessarily in every 
> instance), such as a less exuberant, more restrained character, slower 
> tempo, minor rather than major key, smoother, often conjunct, melodic 
> motion and more frequent dissonant suspensions on downbeats. The 
> similarities, differences and ambiguities between the passacaglia and the 
> chaconne are explored to the fullest in Frescobaldi’s extraordinary Cento 
> partite sopra passacaglie (1637), with its alternating sections marked 
> ‘passacaglie’ and ‘ciaccona’, and sometimes a gradual, subtle 
> metamorphosis from one into the other (see Silbiger, 1996).
>
> Some of these distinctions between the two genres continued to be present 
> in the works of later composers in Italy and elsewhere, particularly when 
> a chaconne and a passacaglia appear side by side or in the same 
> collection; however, when one or the other appears by itself, the 
> distinctive features may be less evident or altogether absent (for Italian 
> composers who published such chaconne-passacaglia pairs, see Chaconne, 
> §2). Composers such as Bernardo Storace also followed in Frescobaldi’s 
> footsteps by shifting key, mode and metre in some of their passacaglias.
>
> In vocal settings, Italian passacaglias were sometimes interrupted by 
> recitatives (e.g. Frescobaldi’s Così mi disprezzate, 1630). Sections that 
> resemble a passacaglia without being identified as such are found in 
> operas, cantatas and sacred works. However, the present-day tendency to 
> regard any lament with a descending tetrachord bass as a passacaglia does 
> not appear to have historical precedence unless the piece also shows other 
> genre markings. By the beginning of the 18th century the passacaglia was 
> rapidly losing ground in Italy, but it continued to flourish in France, 
> Germany and elsewhere for some time.
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 3. Later history in Spain.
> In Spain an active and artistically significant passacaglia tradition 
> survived independently of the chaconne; it remained rooted in the old 
> ritornello practice and was relatively unaffected by the passacaglia 
> developments in Italy and France. Like the early strumming exercises, the 
> later passacaglias continued to be presented in sets covering a full range 
> of commonly used keys, in major as well as minor modes and in duple as 
> well as triple metre. The passacaglias of Francisco Guerau (1694), Antonio 
> de Santa Cruz (c1700) and Santiago de Murcia (1732) were not simple chord 
> formulae, however, but extended variation sets that took full advantage of 
> the guitar’s technical and expressive possibilities. Very similar 
> passacaglias can be found in the contemporary keyboard repertory, 
> including some wonderful examples by Cabanilles.
>
> After Santiago de Murcia’s Passacalles y obras (1732) the passacaglia 
> vanished from the Spanish written tradition. The term ‘passacalle’ 
> continued to be used in folk practice, however, to refer to instrumental 
> preludes and interludes during dancing (for example for the seguidillas in 
> La Mancha; see Russell, 1995, p.88) as well as to music accompanying 
> actual dances (for example for stick dances in Castille; Russell, 80). In 
> some areas of Latin America guitar ritornellos for popular dance music are 
> still called ‘passacalles’ (Hudson, 1981, pp.280–81).
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 4. France.
> In France the Hispanic-Italian passacaglia, like the chaconne, was 
> transformed during the mid-17th century into a distinctive native genre, 
> although before that the genre had already had some impact as an exotic 
> Spanish import. A ‘passacalle’ (in the earlier sense of ritornello) occurs 
> in an air to a Spanish text by De Bailly (1614), and in 1623 the Spanish 
> expatriate Luis de Briçeño published in Paris a guitar method that 
> included in chord tablature brief chaconnes and passacaglias similar to 
> the early Italian examples. During the 1640s the promotion of Italian 
> music and musicians by Cardinal Mazarin brought wider familiarity with the 
> two genres in their newer incarnations. A harpsichord passacaglia by Luigi 
> Rossi (who visited Paris in 1646 and whose Orfeo was performed there the 
> following year) enjoyed wide manuscript circulation. Francesco Corbetta, 
> who settled in Paris around 1648 and became guitar teacher to the future 
> Louis XIV, was perhaps the greatest Italian guitar virtuoso of his time, 
> and the composer of numerous chaconnes and passacaglias.
>
> By the late 1650s the French passacaglia tradition was firmly in place, 
> already showing many of the characteristics that would mark the genre 
> during the later 17th century and the 18th. Like the chaconne, the 
> passacaglia was cultivated both in chamber music, especially by 
> guitarists, lutenists and keyboard players, and on the musical stage. 
> Among the earliest surviving examples are two passacailles for harpsichord 
> by Louis Couperin, which are based on ostinatos that outline descending 
> tetrachords (ex.1c). French composers generally seem to have favoured the 
> chaconne over the passacaglia (see Chaconne, §4); Schneider (1986) lists 
> 18 chaconnes but only five passacaglias in Lully’s theatrical productions, 
> for example. Nevertheless, Lully’s lengthy and impressive passacaille from 
> Armide (1686) became a much admired model of the genre, emulated by many, 
> including Purcell and J.S. Bach. According to theorists such as Brossard 
> (1703) and Rousseau (1767), the passacaglia was ordinarily in the minor 
> and the chaconne in the major (‘rules’ often violated), and passacaglias 
> were performed at more deliberate tempos than chaconnes (18th-century 
> reports indicate c100 beats a minute compared to c120–160 for chaconnes; 
> see Miehling, 1993).
>
> A continuing favourite among French passacaglias is François Couperin’s 
> searingly chromatic Passacaille in B minor from his Ordre no.8 for 
> harpsichord (1717), an extended rondeau structure. After 1740 the 
> passacaglia fell largely out of fashion in instrumental solo and chamber 
> music, but maintained a place on the musical stage throughout the final 
> decades of the century, albeit still far outnumbered by the chaconne.
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 5. Germany.
> Distinct German forms of the passacaglia developed only in the later years 
> of the 17th century, most strikingly in solo organ music. The German 
> organists, drawing on traditions of cantus-firmus improvisation and 
> ground-bass divisions, created a series of majestic ostinato compositions, 
> shaped by increasingly brilliant figurations. A passacaglia from well 
> before 1675 by J.C. Kerll (who had studied in Rome) still used the 
> traditional descending tetrachord as ground-bass formula (ex.1d); however, 
> later composers such as Buxtehude and Pachelbel introduced bass formulae 
> of their own devising, which were treated during at least the first part 
> of the composition as rigorous ostinatos. These bass progressions assume a 
> thematic significance not present in the traditional formulae, as various 
> techniques borrowed from chorale improvisation were brought to bear on 
> them. The busy passage-work and contrapuntal density largely obliterated 
> any dance feeling, and relationships to the genre’s origin became 
> increasingly tenuous. Such is the case in the most famous passacaglia of 
> this tradition, J.S. Bach’s Passacaglia in C minor (bwv582), which 
> concludes with a lengthy fugue on its ostinato subject (possibly derived 
> from a short passacaglia in an organ mass of 1687 by André Raison).
>
> Passacaglias written during the same period for instrumental ensemble more 
> closely followed French models or combined the French and Germanic 
> approaches, as did those conceived primarily for harpsichord. Bach also 
> used the genre in some vocal works, although not indicated as such (bwv12, 
> later reworked into the ‘Crucifixus’ of the Mass in B minor; bwv78). Some 
> might argue that the opening chorus of bwv12 (like the ‘Lamento der 
> Freunde’ in the keyboard Capriccio bwv992) should be classified as a 
> lament rather than as a passacaglia, but there can be no such doubt about 
> the magnificent opening of bwv78, which has all the musical hallmarks of a 
> French operatic chaconne/passacaglia number; indeed, the passacaglia from 
> Lully’s Armide may have been its direct source of inspiration.
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 6. England.
> Pieces called ‘passacaglia’ or ‘passacaille’ are rarely encountered in 
> English sources; compositions that might have been given such titles on 
> the Continent are usually designated ‘chaconne’ or ‘ground’. A notable 
> exception is the passacaille ‘How happy the Lover’ in Purcell’s King 
> Arthur (1691). With its alternating instrumental, solo and vocal sections, 
> this seems to be modelled on the passacaglia in Lully’s Armide (to which 
> there also is a textual reference).
>
> Passacaglia
>
> 7. After 1800.
> When 19th- and 20th-century composers returned to writing passacaglias, 
> they found their models in a handful of ‘rediscovered’ pieces by the 
> German masters, especially Bach’s Passacaglia for organ and perhaps also 
> the Passacaglia from Handel’s Suite no.7 in G minor, works deserving of 
> their canonic status, but atypical of the former mainstream genre 
> traditions (Handel’s passacaglia was in fact in duple metre). From Bach’s 
> passacaglia they took what now became the defining feature: the ostinato 
> bass. The theme-and-variation idea, often incidental to earlier 
> passacaglias (if present at all) became central to the revived genres. As 
> with Bach, the ostinato theme is usually stated at the outset in bare form 
> and in a low register. The association of the passacaglia with Bach and 
> with the organ also contributed to a mood of gravity; most 19th- and 
> 20th-century examples call for a slowish tempo. Some writers attempted to 
> define a distinction between the passacaglia and the chaconne based 
> primarily on the examples by Bach, but no consensus was ever reached and 
> for the most part the terms continued to be used interchangebly. For a 
> more detailed discussion of the modern revival of the chaconne and 
> passacaglia, see Chaconne, §7.
>
> Passacaglia
>
> BIBLIOGRAPHY
> L. Stein: ‘The Passacaglia in the Twentieth Century’, ML, xl (1959), 
> 150–53
>
> F. Mathiassen: ‘Jeppesen’s Passacaglia’, Natalicia musicologica Knud 
> Jeppesen septuagenario collegis oblata, ed. B. Hjelmborg and S. Sørenson 
> (Copenhagen, 1962), 293–308
>
> M. Schuler: ‘Zur Frühgeschichte der Passacaglia’, Mf, xvi (1963), 121–26
>
> T. Walker: ‘Ciaccona and Passacaglia: Remarks on their Origin and Early 
> History’, JAMS, xxi (1968), 300–20
>
> D.D. Handel: The Contemporary Passacaglia (diss., U. of Rochester, 1969)
>
> D.D. Handel: ‘Britten’s Use of the Passacaglia’, Tempo no.92 (1970), 2–6
>
> R. Hudson: ‘Further Remarks on the Passacaglia and Ciaccona’, JAMS, xxiii 
> (1970), 302–14
>
> R. Hudson: ‘The Ripresa, the Ritornello, and the Passacaglia’, JAMS, xxiv 
> (1971), 364–94
>
> R. Hudson: Passacaglio and Ciaccona: from Guitar Music to Italian Keyboard 
> Variations in the 17th Century (Ann Arbor, 1981)
>
> N.D. Pennington: The Spanish Baroque Guitar with a Transcription of De 
> Murcia’s ‘Passacalles y obras’ (Ann Arbor, 1981)
>
> R. Hudson: The Folia, the Saraband, the Passacaglia, and the Chaconne, 
> MSD, xxxv (1982)
>
> H. Schneider: ‘Chaconne und Passacaille bei Lully’, Studi corelliani IV: 
> Fusignano 1986, 319–34
>
> H. Pimmer: Die süddeutsch-österreichische Chaconne und Passacaglia 
> 1670–1770 (Munich, 1992)
>
> R. Harris-Warrick: ‘Interpreting Pendulum Markings for French Baroque 
> Dances’, Historical Performance, vi (1993), 9–22
>
> C.H. Russell: Santiago de Murcia’s Códice Saldivar no.4: a Treasure of 
> Secular Guitar Music from Baroque Mexico, i (Urbana, IL, 1995)
>
> A. Silbiger: ‘Passacaglia and Ciaccona: Genre Pairing and Ambiguity from 
> Frescobaldi to Couperin’, Journal of Seventeenth-Century Music, ii/1 
> (1996) <www.sscm-jscm.org>
>
> M. Zenck: ‘Reinterpreting Bach in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’, 
> The Cambridge Companion to Bach, ed. J. Butt (Cambridge, 1997), 226–50
>
> J. Schwartz: ‘The Passacaille in Lully's Armide: Phrase Structure in the 
> Choreography and the Music’, EMc, xxvi (1998), 300–320
>
> For further bibliography see Chaconne and Ostinato.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Clauss Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:23 AM
> Subject: [LUTE] Ciaconna
>
>
>> Hello,
>> I am looking for the Grove's article about Passacaille (i have the one 
>> about
>> chaconne but it's not same as everybody knows :-)
>> Could anyone send it to me ?
>> Thank you
>>
>> Gilbert
>>
>> --
>>
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>
> 




_________________________________________________________________
Need personalized email and website? Look no further. It's easy
with Doteasy $0 Web Hosting! Learn more at www.doteasy.com


Reply via email to