[LUTE] Re: Colascione and Gallichon

2005-08-12 Thread Roman Turovsky
> > I suspect Stephen is mistaken in identification of the Schorn axe as > > colascione > > you may just as well call it calichon, as Pietro does. The question is how to tie it into the Ukrainian tradition, where it obviously sticks out like a sore thumb that no one wants to mention. Modern bandur

[LUTE] Re: Colascione and Gallichon

2005-08-12 Thread Mathias Rösel
"Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I suspect Stephen is mistaken in identification of the Schorn axe as > colascione you may just as well call it calichon, as Pietro does. I was lucky to play on Axel Weidenfels's copy of Schorn. It very much resembles a chitarrone in terms of sound (a

[LUTE] Re: Colascione and Gallichon

2005-08-12 Thread Roman Turovsky
> At 10:41 AM 8/12/2005, Roman Turovsky wrote: > >I suspect Stephen is mistaken in identification of the Schorn axe as > >colascione, as it bears dangerously close resemblance to 2 pictures here > >midpage http://www.polyhymnion.org/torban/mamai4.html > > > Interesting. Even more so is the ca.1900

[LUTE] Re: Colascione and Gallichon

2005-08-12 Thread Eugene C. Braig IV
At 10:41 AM 8/12/2005, Roman Turovsky wrote: >I suspect Stephen is mistaken in identification of the Schorn axe as >colascione, as it bears dangerously close resemblance to 2 pictures here >midpage http://www.polyhymnion.org/torban/mamai4.html Interesting. To get on or off this list see list