[LUTE] Re: Falkenhagen's baroque lute - was: Falkenhagen's Angelique

2009-07-15 Thread Lex van Sante
And neither does the rose. RT - Original Message - From: "David Tayler" > To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:10 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Falkenhagen's baroque lute - was: Falkenhagen's Angelique Thanks to Markus and Chris fo

[LUTE] Re: Falkenhagen's baroque lute - was: Falkenhagen's Angelique

2009-07-14 Thread Roman Turovsky
And neither does the rose. RT - Original Message - From: "David Tayler" To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:10 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Falkenhagen's baroque lute - was: Falkenhagen's Angelique Thanks to Markus and Chri

[LUTE] Re: Falkenhagen's baroque lute - was: Falkenhagen's Angelique

2009-07-14 Thread David Tayler
Thanks to Markus and Chris for the info--this is a very interesting engraving. I would love to get a look at the original, because the strings are so carefully drawn, it should be possible to look inside the pegbox and see not only which pegs are empty but if they form some sort of pattern. I c

[LUTE] Re: Falkenhagen's baroque lute - was: Falkenhagen's Angelique

2009-07-14 Thread Roman Turovsky
On the engraving Falckenhagen plays a converted angelique, so Howard's question is of little relevance here. RT - Original Message - From: "Markus Lutz" To: "howard posner" Cc: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu List" Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:39 PM Subject: [LUTE] Falkenhagen's baroque lut