lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens G.
Crona
Verzonden: woensdag 19 maart 2014 14:13
Aan: Lute List
Onderwerp: [LUTE] Re: Lute publications
I believe the consensus today to be separate publications. One could take
Jan W. J. Burgers' Tree edition of Cutting as an e
er, part-style insert. That was also
effective in not requiring the excessive page turns of a parallel-notation edition and
only requiring one publication release.
Best,
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of
Tobi
ent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:54 PM
To: Anthony Hart; Lute List
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Lute publications
On 03/19/2014 05:45 AM, Anthony Hart wrote:
> Following my previous posts I am in the final stages of preparing the
> lute sonatas of Antonino Reggio. The delema is should I inc
On 03/19/2014 05:45 AM, Anthony Hart wrote:
Following my previous posts I am in the final stages of preparing the
lute sonatas of Antonino Reggio. The delema is should I include the
tablature in the samr volume as the staff edition of would it be better
to publish two separate vol
so far I remeber, the original is not in tablature, isn't it?
Le Mercredi 19 mars 2014 16h13, Rockford Mjos a
ecrit :
As I remember Anthony's project, the original is in score format and he
is providing an editorial intabulation for performers.
The options brought up by Chris are
Anthony,
as I understand it now, I would suggest the following. Make one volume with
the original score in facsimile, and your own editorial of it. The other
would be your intabulation. And that one would be the most interesting for
us players and the other one for musicologists? Is the reason
As I remember Anthony's project, the original is in score format and he is
providing an editorial intabulation for performers.
The options brought up by Chris are interesting. My wife is considering
publishing on a specialized topic and weighing the pros and cons of print
versus electronic form
Dear Anthony,
We've corresponded about the sonatas by Reggio before. In my view it
all depends whether you are intending to produce a facsimile of the
original sonatas - if so, a parallel modern transcription would be
redundant since they are already in staff notation. Personally I
Anthony,
I suppose you would need to think about the demographic you want to
target. As a performer familiar with the lute, if the facsimile is clear, I
would not want the transcription at all. I neither want the bulk of the extra
pages nor would I wish to pay for a transcription into a se
I mean, they could be in one volume of course, but separate. Tablature
together and transcriptions behind.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Hart"
To: "Lute List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:45 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Lute publications
Following my previous posts I am in the
I believe the consensus today to be separate publications. One could take
Jan W. J. Burgers' Tree edition of Cutting as an example.
G.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Hart"
To: "Lute List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:45 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Lute publications
Following m
Thanks for the feedback on the letter 'd'.
You are the first person to describe it as confusing. Actually I
designed it carefully, together with the other ciphers, so that each
cipher would be distinctive - at least in my eyes.
One of the considerations was that it should be self-contained
b
Daniel Shoskes wrote:
> One comment: the tablature letter "d" in your samples has a very
> confusing appearance. Any chance to change the font to something with
> a more prominent tail?
That was my reaction also.
--
Stephen Fryer
Lund Computer Services
A great and worthwhile idea, especially for us time limited amateurs who,
despite stern admonitions, refuse to learn Italian tab.
One comment: the tablature letter "d" in your samples has a very confusing
appearance. Any chance to change the font to something with a more prominent
tail?
DS
O
14 matches
Mail list logo