[LUTE] Re: Microphone [Scanned]

2008-09-27 Thread David Tayler
-cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: Microphone [Scanned] The Boss is a 16 bit machine, so not really suitable for classical music recording. Although it claims 24 bit conversion, it is 16 bit, so that is pretty misleading. There are also no real published figures for noise, which is unusual to say

[LUTE] Re: Microphone [Scanned]

2008-09-25 Thread Narada
my lute yet. Suppose I ought to really. Neil -Original Message- From: David Tayler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 September 2008 20:27 To: lute-cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: [LUTE] Re: Microphone [Scanned] The Boss is a 16 bit machine, so not really suitable for classical music

[LUTE] Re: Microphone [Scanned]

2008-09-24 Thread David Tayler
The Boss is a 16 bit machine, so not really suitable for classical music recording. Although it claims 24 bit conversion, it is 16 bit, so that is pretty misleading. There are also no real published figures for noise, which is unusual to say the least. For that kind of price you can get an RME

[LUTE] Re: Microphone [Scanned]

2008-09-23 Thread Narada
I think you ought to look at the Boss BR series. I use a BR 1600 CD. 16 Tracks - so that's 16 mics - 256 virtual tracks and more microphone, ambience, hall, reverb blah, blah, blah settings that you can shake a stick at. It also allows you to produce professional grade CD's without the need to