[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-29 Thread LGS-Europe
>> On the issue of basses I think the jury is still out. The study of >> history >> is full of examples of ancient technology that we cannot duplicate even >> with >> all of our science and data bases. Personally I think it unlikely that >> period Lute players would have been happy with what we c

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Roman Turovsky
NO. Because the lute on the Weichenberger CD is massively out of tune, I suspect from untrue strings. But TS should have known better not to record under such conditions. RT >> Less tuning than necessary. >> RT > > RT, a genuine question: do you say this because you are an advocate of ET? > > P

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Roman Turovsky
sage - >> From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Paul Pleijsier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Paul >> O'Dette in time machine >> >> >> >> I

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Stephan . Olbertz
quot;Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Paul Pleijsier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Paul > O'Dette in time machine > > > >> I just put on one of T Satoh's (two?) re

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread David Rastall
On Mar 28, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Paul Pleijsier wrote: > I guess the early people wouldn't care much if POD played with > "strange inflexible" strings or with or without nails. I guess > these things are only interesting to US, especially to those who > care about approaching the sound of the p

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread chriswilke
> - Original Message - > From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Paul Pleijsier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:49 PM > Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine > > >

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Paul Pleijsier
al Message - > From: "6string" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:07 PM > Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine > > >> That's it, it is still on. I g

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Roman Turovsky
But a well-tuned axe should be. RT > That's it, it is still on. I guess I'll never learn to distingiush between > pieces, but the sound is special. > Wait, I'll look up "wart". Ah, a "wrat" in Dutch. > Yes, I find that total technical perfection is not neccessarily an > ingredient in a great perfor

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Paul Pleijsier
; Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine >> I just put on one of T Satoh's (two?) records where he plays no nail, gut >> strung, close hand, and on . >> original (Greif) lute from 16-something. To my ears this is conv

[LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine

2006-03-28 Thread Paul Pleijsier
rmance. PP - Original Message - From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Pleijsier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Paul O'Dette in time machine >> I just put on one of T Satoh's (two