> Indeed the R-09 HR has a very wide polar pattern for the mics, the result
> being an unfocused
> stereo image of the instrument and more room sound for a given mic
> placement.
Yes, those are my experiences with the Roland too. Several friends
have one (my music school had a scheme where you cou
heiman.dan...@juno.com wrote:
I stand by my recommendation for Roland/Edirol. The entry level model is labeled R-05,
As well as user reviews it's also helpful to look at the specification, and
even the manual.
.but best of all, there's a site here which has sound samples:-
http://www.wingf
Before I buy any new electronic product I always spend some time scanning the
reviews on the Internet, paying special attention to the negative ones to find
out what can go wrong. Having done that for the pocket digital recorders now
available, I stand by my recommendation for Roland/Edirol. I
I bought an original Edirol R-09 when it first came out (in Japan) and it
changed my life. Of course any other similar recorder would have also changed
it. When it finally died after many years, I figured the cost of repair would
be enough that I might as well buy a new recorder as whole generat
Dear all,
Many thanks for your replies. It seems there is consensus on the Zoom.
These had attracted me when I saw the specs. Now to decide the budget and
H2 or H4.
Thanks again, I can rely on your collective wisdom to solve problems!!
Best wishes and happy weekend
Anthony
--
__
Anthony: I would like to put in a plug for the Edirol R-09 recorders from
Roland. They are among the most compact and lightest of the pocket recorders.
The original version was made in Japan, but has a relatively fragile design for
the door that covers the memory chip slot and the batteries, a
