[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-22 Thread Ron Fletcher
As I understand it. We have standard theorboes and we have toy theorboes. So if French poodles are anything to go by, there should also be miniature theorboes. I have waited two weeks for someone to ask this. Now who knows the centimetres to tell the difference? Best Wishes Ron (UK)

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-22 Thread Jarosław Lipski
Dear David, Sorry for writing without giving any numbers, but I thought all this toy theorbo discussion is pointless. There are just instruments of different sizes. Comparing to the flute familly, I wouldn't call piccolo flute a toy flute. Even the smallest instrument can be a concert instrumen

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-22 Thread howard posner
On Feb 22, 2009, at 9:11 AM, David Rastall wrote: > The current topic under discussion of "toy" theorbos has failed so > far to answer the one question without which there is no basis for > discussion at all, namely, what size does a theorbo have to be so > that it can no longer be called a "toy"

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-22 Thread David Rastall
On Feb 22, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Mathias Rösel wrote: > 42 >8) > > Mathias Thank you, Mathias. You're the only one who has given me what I requested: a straight numerical answer. Unfortunately, wrong question! ;-) Conclusion: it is easier on the lute list to get the answer to life, the un

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-23 Thread Martyn Hodgson
I'm happy to give you my views. Clearly there's no absolutes and national preferences and pitch variations mean no single figure is 'right' in all circumstances: but this, and the use of modern overwound strings, has led to a situation where some are unecessarily stringing small in

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-23 Thread David Tayler
It is the material. Toy theorbos are made of dreams. dt At 09:11 AM 2/22/2009, you wrote: >The current topic under discussion of "toy" theorbos has failed so >far to answer the one question without which there is no basis for >discussion at all, namely, what size does a theorbo have to be so >that

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-23 Thread Mayes
It is immaterial - all theorbos are made of dreams. JM On 2/23/09 3:34 PM, "David Tayler" wrote: > It is the material. Toy theorbos are made of dreams. > dt > > At 09:11 AM 2/22/2009, you wrote: >> The current topic under discussion of "toy" theorbos has failed so >> far to answer the one que

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-23 Thread Daniel Winheld
Wonderful! You are getting closer, grasshoppers. It is immaterial - all theorbos are made of dreams. JM > It is the material. Toy theorbos are made of dreams. > dt "What does modern Western popular wisdom know about the power of objects? Has it ever heard the voice

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-23 Thread David Rastall
On Feb 23, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Daniel Winheld wrote: >Wonderful! You are getting closer, grasshoppers. Ah, but do not forget, glasshoppah...stopped string lengths of low 80's make for toy dreams only. >"What does modern Western popular wisdom know about the power of >objects? Has it ev

[LUTE] Re: Straight Answer Please

2009-02-23 Thread Daniel Winheld
Starting to stink a bit of Zen in these parts. Straight answers are clearly out the window again. (Be real careful what you ask for!) > >Wonderful! You are getting closer, grasshoppers. > >Ah, but do not forget, glasshoppah...stopped string lengths of low >80's make for toy dreams only. I b