My best compliments for your recording and for giving us such
comparison possibility. Apologies for being in the "incorrect" side*,
but I prefer the Rutherford version. I found on it a natural
reverberation I like so much, not present at Tomlinson one in my
opinion. And yes, -sorry a
Rob, et al,
--- On Thu, 12/31/09, Rob MacKillop wrote:
> Definitely the gut
> 11c. The 13c sound is very typical for today, but I
> think in a decade or so it will be viewed
> in the same way we view the
> 1970s recordings with big booming basses,
> but this time overall too
> big, t
Definitely the gut 11c. The 13c sound is very typical for today, but I
think in a decade or so it will be viewed in the same way we view the
1970s recordings with big booming basses, but this time overall too
big, too bright, too 'in your face'. I'd love to hear your 13c strung
in gu
Danny-
Bravo! Very satisfying videos. I'm with Ed Martin on this; I much
prefer the 11 course in gut, although they both sound very good. It
reminds me of my own 13 course, which is mostly gut, while your 13
course shares some of the tonal qualities of my archlute, which is
all synthetic inclu
On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Edward Martin wrote:
> , but if the 2 lutes were strung
> similarly, one could get more of a sense of comparison.
So your work's cut out for you.
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Very interesting experiment, Danny. I saw many make comments on You
Tube, but as I do not have an account, I could not comment there.
Nice playing, and I enjoyed both interpretations. Well done!
I must have different tastes from what others posted, because I
actually prefer the 11 course vers
