David's is the only one I have measured that works, but perhaps some
of the other ones work.
dt
At 11:58 AM 2/8/2009, you wrote:
>Charles Browne wrote:
>>There is a fret placement spreadsheet on the LSA website that will
>>provide you with all the information without re-calculation. It
>>will g
> Stuart Walsh wrote:
>> multiplying by 43. But - so much choice. Any advice on a temperament for
>> second half of fifteenth century?
For earlier music, Ars Nova and Trecento, I use Pythagorean
temperament. It was a surpsrise to me how much Italian early 16th
century music I still could play wit
Stuart Walsh wrote:
Charles Browne wrote:
There is a fret placement spreadsheet on the LSA website that will
provide you with all the information without re-calculation. It will
give fret positions for a number of temperaments/and string lengths
it is worth looking at!
Charles
Thanks. Found
Yes, especially for that Falkenhagen Prelude.
RT
From: "David Rastall"
On the subject of fret placement, what about fret placement on the
Baroque lute?
Davidr
dlu...@verizon.net
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
On the subject of fret placement, what about fret placement on the
Baroque lute?
Davidr
dlu...@verizon.net
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Stuart,
Try the 1/4 comma to start; the thinking being to overdo the change so
you can more easily define its differences. You can always scale back
to 1/6 and compare. If you go the 1/4 comma route you may want to play
your lower F#s on the 6th G fret till you get a tastino, at least for
Charles Browne wrote:
There is a fret placement spreadsheet on the LSA website that will
provide you with all the information without re-calculation. It will
give fret positions for a number of temperaments/and string lengths
it is worth looking at!
Charles
Thanks. Found it and punched in the
Stuart Walsh wrote:
David van Ooijen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Stuart Walsh
wrote:
Did someone once put up a calculator which which worked out fret
positions,
in meantone, for a given string length?
Stuart
It's not exactly a calculator, but it has a table with numbers
David van Ooijen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Stuart Walsh wrote:
Did someone once put up a calculator which which worked out fret positions,
in meantone, for a given string length?
Stuart
It's not exactly a calculator, but it has a table with numbers to
multiply string le
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:35 AM, David Tayler wrote:
> I can vouch that David's system works perfectly and as I result I owe
> him a beer for life.
I'll take you up on that one!
David - just wondering: won't that give a headache for life?
***
David van Ooijen
davidv
I can vouch that David's system works perfectly and as I result I owe
him a beer for life.
dt
At 02:53 PM 2/7/2009, you wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> > Did someone once put up a calculator which which worked out fret positions,
> > in meantone, for a given string
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> Did someone once put up a calculator which which worked out fret positions,
> in meantone, for a given string length?
Stuart
It's not exactly a calculator, but it has a table with numbers to
multiply string length with.
http://home.planet.n
12 matches
Mail list logo