Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-18 Thread JEdwardsMusic
In a message dated 3/17/2005 4:58:57 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yesterday I played the 2 Sor pieces from http://polyhymnion.org/swv/opus-2.html on my 13-course. Did it turn it into a guitar? Hi Roman, I was just thinking some of Sor's etudes might sound really well on

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Martyn Hodgson
or different. In any case, this is how we use these words it in the NEW country. My warmest regards to all, Marion -Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 16, 2005 11:48 AM To: Roman Turovsky Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you Roman, in short - a guitar

Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-17 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other shapes as well for that matter - eg lyre guitar). - defining a guitar as a 'shallow bodied' instrument is surely asking

Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-17 Thread Mathias Rösel
Incidentally, on this business of early steps towards using 'old' instruments in performance, are you aware of the 1845 concert in which Ventura (the harp-lute-guitar man and principal competitor of Edward Light) played the theorbo (Galpin Soc Journal 1989). There's no evidence as to how

Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-17 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Mathias, Thank you fr this - I'm not quite sure the point you're making. I specifically said that we ought not to think of V's instrument as a guitar - my comment point about the tuning he might have employed was an altogether different point; I'm sorry if this was not clear enough. As has

Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-17 Thread Roman Turovsky
Mathias, Thank you fr this - I'm not quite sure the point you're making. I specifically said that we ought not to think of V's instrument as a guitar - my comment point about the tuning he might have employed was an altogether different point; I'm sorry if this was not clear enough. As

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Eugene C. Braig IV
I've written quite a bit on my thoughts of this in correspondence with various characters on and off list, so I'll try to focus here as much as I'm able. At 07:47 PM 3/16/2005, Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote: In biology (and Eugene will correct me if I am wrong) if something is sufficiently difficult

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 17, 2005 12:21 AM To: Dr. Marion = Ceruti Cc: Lute Net S= ubject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Marion, Thank you - but I'm not sure ths is really relevant - in particul= ar what authority composed the Webster's entry? rgds M

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon I've written quite a bit on my thoughts of this in correspondence with various characters on and off list, so I'll try to focus here as much as I'm able. At 07:47 PM 3/16/2005, Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote: In biology (and Eugene will correct me if I am wrong

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Roman Turovsky
An interesting study (that I don't have time to do) would be to develop an ontology of musical instruments and their characteristics at a fine-grained level of detail. Finer the grinding, more detail lost, FYI. RT To get on or off this list see list information at

Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-17 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Please, Roman - I was v careful to insert the adjective 'only' in front of 'music' ; perhaps I ought to have gone even further and made it clear I'm speaking about the instrument in the normal guitar tuning. I can't think what else wld have been done with it in the mid 19thC. To my mind

Re: (Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon) - theorbo in the 19thC

2005-03-17 Thread Roman Turovsky
Please, Roman - I was v careful to insert the adjective 'only' in front of 'music' ; perhaps I ought to have gone even further and made it clear I'm speaking about the instrument in the normal guitar tuning. I can't think what else wld have been done with it in the mid 19thC. There are a few

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Michael Thames
www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com - Original Message - From: Dr. Marion Ceruti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eugene C. Braig IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Arto Wikla [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:13 AM Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Dear Eugene, Thank you for responding

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
: Michael Thames [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mar 17, 2005 10:39 AM To: Dr. Marion Ceruti [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eugene C. Braig IV [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arto Wikla [EMAIL PROTECTED], lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon ++This becomes problematic. there often

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Arto Wikla
Dear all On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Eugene C. Braig IV wrote: Put a horse and a donkey together, and you get an obviously intermediary hybrid, the mule. Nobody is giving birth to dragons and chimeras. This reminds me of an old story that happened to me years ago. I have told the story also here

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-17 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
Dear Arto, ...he told me he would like to build a lute himself. I said that I know where you can order drawings of original lutes. He answered: No, no, I want to make it just from my own ideas. If that guy some day made something, which he called lute, what was that thing afterall? Was it a

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other shapes as well for that matter - eg lyre guitar). - defining a guitar as a 'shallow bodied' instrument is surely asking for trouble - probably better to relate to

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
- From: Martyn Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lute Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Jon Murphy
Hear, hear Dr. Marion, In my opinion how it could be used is more important than what you call it. Depending on how you tune a six-course instrument, it could function as a guitar, requinto (actually a requinto lute in this case), renaissance lute, a laud, or a mandolino lombardo ottavo. I

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Roman Turovsky
@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other shapes as well for that matter - eg lyre guitar). - defining a guitar as a 'shallow bodied' instrument

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
In my opinion how it could be used is more important than what you call it. that would indeed be the case, if some of the names were synonymous. However, each name stands for a certain tuning, stringing, kind of playing, and repertoire. -- Regards Mathias -- To get on or off this list see

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
Thank you for your critique, Martyn, but: as far as I'm aware, guitars are defined as box-neck-lutes, i. e. with a neck and a box-like body (kastenhalslauten, in German), as opposed to shell-neck-lutes, i. e. with a neck and a shell-like body (schalenhalslauten) which are what most of us are used

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Precisely my point regards, Martyn Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my opinion how it could be used is more important than what you call it. that would indeed be the case, if some of the names were synonymous. However, each name stands for a certain tuning, stringing, kind of

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Martyn Hodgson
not atypical. Both Budapest Jauch and Brunner baroque lutes suffered this at some point during the 19th century. RT -- http://polyhymnion.org/torban -Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Roman Turovsky
, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other shapes as well for that matter - eg lyre guitar). - defining a guitar

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Roman Turovsky
/torban -Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lute Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Martyn Hodgson
-Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
Martyn, since usage of musical instruments has in many cases been uncertain, musicologists tend to define musical instruments by their building structure. As for kastenhals (box-like body + neck) vs schalenhals (shell-like body + neck) lutes, that definition can be traced back to Curt Sachs or

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
Dear Marion, you are certainly right in saying that many of us draw artificial boundaries for ourselves that restrict our playing. You may string and play any instrument the way and kind you wish to play and have fun. But the issue I try to pursue is, rather, which way the instrument in question

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other shapes as well for that matter - eg lyre guitar). - defining a guitar as a 'shallow bodied' instrument is surely asking

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Martyn Hodgson
-Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias, but: - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and in other shapes as well

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Roman Turovsky
suffered this at some point during the 19th century. RT -- http://polyhymnion.org/torban -Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you for your comments Mathias

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Roman Turovsky
Budapest Jauch and Brunner baroque lutes suffered this at some point during the 19th century. RT -- http://polyhymnion.org/torban -Original Message- From: Martyn Hodgson Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM To: Mathias R? Cc: Lute Net Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
] Sent: Mar 16, 2005 11:48 AM To: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lute Net lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Thank you Roman, in short - a guitar M Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A lautenguitarre of sorts, REMARCABLY with original double-strung set-up

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Arto Wikla
Dear all On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote: To clarify the semantics, one can refer to the following definitions from Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary: Actually the general dictionaries are not a reliable source of definitions of special subjects as musicology or especially

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
Martyn Hodgson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Thank you Roman, in short - a guitar well, everyone is free to pray the way he or she wants to. Regards Mathias -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
Dear Marion, yes, the mandora in question is a 18th century lute with 6 to 9 courses. There is an recently published article available in the net http://www.marincola.com/ click on LuteBot (left margin), and then #5 (middle). There, you will find Pietro Prosser's thesis on the mandora / the

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Mathias Rösel
Guitar - a flat-bodied stringed instrument with a long fretted neck and usually six strings plucked with a pick or with the fingers. quite exact. During 19th and 20th centuries there were quite a lot of types in existence, differing in size and number of strings, after all. Interestingly

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
1:48 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Dear all On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote: To clarify the semantics, one can refer to the following definitions from Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary: Actually the general dictionaries are not a reliable

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
the best, Marion -Original Message- From: Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mar 16, 2005 3:47 PM To: Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Dear Marion, yes, the mandora in question is a 18th century lute with 6 to 9 courses. There is an recently

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Howard Posner
Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote: These terms are in common usage. I am not particularly satisfied that this is the best that can be done with definitions, but this is what the words mean in American English. I'm guessing that 99.999%, give or take a few, of the persons who've used the word guitar in

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
Dear Howard, Please see my comments below. Have a nice evening, Marion -Original Message- From: Howard Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mar 16, 2005 5:08 PM To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon Dr. Marion Ceruti wrote: These terms are in common usage. I am

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread JEdwardsMusic
In a message dated 3/16/2005 5:37:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ++Unfortunately this has just been demonstrated graphically among a group of people who should know better. Without mentioning the name of the organization specifically, when a (past not current) membership

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-16 Thread Dr. Marion Ceruti
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon In a message dated 3/16/2005 5:37:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ++Unfortunately this has just been demonstrated graphically among a group of people who should know better. Without

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-15 Thread Martyn Hodgson
My view is that it is most likely a guitar (or rather late 19thC german lute/guitar) conversion direct from a lute. There are numerous examples of 18thC Colachons/mandoras (see Gill et als) and leaving aside the obvious guitar conversion features (eg bridge, rose) it looks pretty atypical (eg

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-15 Thread Roman Turovsky
My view is that it is most likely a guitar (or rather late 19thC german lute/guitar) conversion direct from a lute. There are numerous examples of 18thC Colachons/mandoras (see Gill et als) and leaving aside the obvious guitar conversion features (eg bridge, rose) it looks pretty atypical (eg

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-15 Thread Mathias Rösel
My view is that it is most likely a guitar guitars have shallow bodies, by definition, or so I'm told. Whatsoever this is, it is not a guitar. (or rather late 19thC german lute/guitar) conversion direct from a lute. wandervogel lutes (if that is what you meant to say) have single strings,

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-14 Thread Roman Turovsky
Seems to be A MANDORA, but the top is not original, was made into a guitar. RT http://polyhymnion.org From: Hans Kockelmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] A strange lute by Joh Christian Hoffmann, 1733 for sale. What could it be? A colascione? http://www.music-treasures.com/ click on

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-14 Thread Mathias Rösel
Roman Turovsky mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Seems to be A MANDORA, but the top is not original, was made into a guitar. The instrument has six courses, if I'm not mistaken, not five (so, it's not what is generally accepted as guitar). According to Pohlmann's list (2nd ed. 1982), mandoras

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-14 Thread Roman Turovsky
I don't like that bridge position. RT Seems to be A MANDORA, but the top is not original, was made into a guitar. The instrument has six courses, if I'm not mistaken, not five (so, it's not what is generally accepted as guitar). According to Pohlmann's list (2nd ed. 1982), mandoras from

Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon

2005-03-14 Thread Mathias Rösel
I don't like that bridge position. nor do I. The position of the bridge and the curved shape of the pegbox remind me of the so-called Wagner-Laute (Magnus Tieffenbrucker, 1610, now preserved in Wagner-Museum, Triebschen / Luzern) which has probably been rebuilt and has similar traits.