A helpful resource in understanding public domain and copyright law (USA
only) is Stanford University's Library site and can be found at
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/
-jdh
--
The discussion of Copyrights and Copywrongs seems to me to fall into
the category of religeous debate, right up there with the Micro$oft /
Unix crusaders. I suppose some of us are devout believers in what we
regard as the side of Right and some of us are even evangelical. I
think the lev
> The real challenge for publishers like MO is to be creative in the
> cover art, editing, and info. quality of paper etc.It's amazing how this
> Monkey can elevate the physical book itself, above the content.
Not in MO's hands. He made the most execrable cover for MoscowWeissMs.
RT
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Facsimiles etc.
> Thank you, Mr. Reyerman.
>
> Whether the music itself is in the public domain or not,
> reproducing/
Thank you, Mr. Reyerman.
Whether the music itself is in the public domain or not,
reproducing/distributing the work of others (in this case, Mr. Reyerman's production
and
publication of a facsimile) without compensation or permission is disrespectful as
well
as unethical.
Thanks to those who
